KM6CQ
Member
Other than the live screen, what will ProScan and Butel do that Sentinel will not?
Thanks, Dan
Thanks, Dan
ProScan and ARC536 can allow you to import systems and their details from the RadioReference database (as long as you remain a Premium Subscriber).Other than the live screen, what will ProScan and Butel do that Sentinel will not?
Thanks, Dan
Thank you for the reply. For my use I can stay with Sentinel, I downloaded the other two and did not see anything additional I could utilize.ProScan and ARC536 can allow you to import systems and their details from the RadioReference database (as long as you remain a Premium Subscriber).
The Basic version of ARC536 (about $40) allows programming. But if you want also want the ability to use virtual control, as well as logging of activity, You would need to, instead, purchase the Pro version (about $70). ProScan,@ $50, allows programming as well as virtual control & logging. It also supports multiple other Uniden scanners.
Sentinel, which is a free download from Uniden, is required to update the database for the scanner, as well as apply any firmware updates, if & when any are released. You also need Sentinel to edit your profile, including your location, desired range, and selected service types to be monitored.
On just the programming in ProScan:Thank you for the reply. For my use I can stay with Sentinel, I downloaded the other two and did not see anything additional I could utilize.
It does not appear I would be limited in scanning by using Sentinel.
Whistler isn't Uniden, you would need software designed for Whistler to do your logging, unless the Whistler has that ability built in.Is there any advantage between the two if you're using them for logging off a Whistler WS-1065? I would like to dedicate a spare scanner I have to logging. Not being in the scanner hobby that long, it's hard to evaluate the merits.
Ah! Bummer. I have (3) new Whistler WS-1065 scanners so I don't think I'll need a Uniden. Oh well. I tried.
I'm waiting for Vonskie to get hold of a Whistler scanner so he can support it in his excellent ScannerScreen program. That program can log all scanner activities as well as displaying a virtual scanner screen on a PC.Is there any advantage between the two if you're using them for logging off a Whistler WS-1065? I would like to dedicate a spare scanner I have to logging. Not being in the scanner hobby that long, it's hard to evaluate the merits.