Radio Shack 19-1208 Business Band Questions?
- Thread starter southbound35wnow
- Start date
- Status
We don't care.
Well, actually, you are. I don't mind someone being cocky, if they have knowledge and experience to be cocky about. You have neither.
We don't care.
You have yet to demonstrate that possibility. I'm inclined to believe you don't.
Of course it isn't. No one here said it is. But do enlighten us, Oh, Wise One.
At this juncture, you need to elaborate and share with the group what it is you know, or what little credibility you think you have is lost. Tell me... what other things have come along.
You're clearly out of your league here. You're starting to look foolish, as well as cocky.
Again, no one said you did. I use a yagi and a spectrum analyzer. Tell us more about your magic secret thing that rarely comes out of the box. You've piqued my curiosity.
Well, ok. You haven't, really. You have a great deal to learn, but your mind seems to be shut tight.
Last edited:
Naw, let's just move it to the wasteland. We'll get bored of it soon enough.
Don_Burke
Member
He might just be high on something.zz0468 said:
He certainly has enough hallucinations for that to be it.
I just figured it was testosterone poisoning.
ka5lqj
Member
Medical advice.....
Thank GOD. I finally reached the age that doesn't bother me anymore, LOL!
73,
"Buck"/KA5LQJ
Thank GOD. I finally reached the age that doesn't bother me anymore, LOL!
73,
"Buck"/KA5LQJ
Rumpaltin
Grand Master
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2007
- Messages
- 8
I know this post is old, but for anyone who may still look at it, I have one question for David. Are you licensed to operate on those frequencies? cuz if your not then you are doing the same thing he is, operating illegally on the same band and therefor he can't possibly be causing interference to your legal setup as for you to be able to have interference to your legal setup you would have to be legally licensed to operate that band and on top of that the FCC only issues ONE of those eight frequencies to a license, possibly TWO with special reason to need two frequencies in that band so your chances of finding him operating if you are legally licensed to use even two of those frequencies is slim to non for the remote wilderness.
And unless you live with say 3-5 miles off him you would have to go to his city/ neighborhood to hear him, but since he is only using them hunting you would then have to follow him out to his hunting grounds to hear him, and this would there for be stalking him.
As for the calling 911 for the person weaving on the road, how do you know he is drunk? that person could be on his way home from a long day at work and tired.
Cheers
More trolling or what?!.............
As for the person weaving on the road, what does it matter if he is drunk or tired, if weaving all over the road they should be reported. Somebody can just as easily be killed, and indeed have been, by a driver falling asleep as one that is drunk. There is no logic to your argument "that person could be on his way home from a long day at work and tired."
Similar to the lack of logic the misguided legislators here that want to overturn the ban on Pit-Bulls; "But chiuauas bite people too!!" I COULD SQUAQSH A CHIUAUA LIKE A BUG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Besides the whole thread turned out to be some punk kid with two memberships set up and just trollling.
Stalking......Puuuuuleeeeese!!
OUT!!!!
Wow!! That was a good resurrection!! The comment about listening on a legal setup was merely hypothetical. Similar to my first post in the thread "if I were ever to get the chance".
As for the person weaving on the road, what does it matter if he is drunk or tired, if weaving all over the road they should be reported. Somebody can just as easily be killed, and indeed have been, by a driver falling asleep as one that is drunk. There is no logic to your argument "that person could be on his way home from a long day at work and tired."
Similar to the lack of logic the misguided legislators here that want to overturn the ban on Pit-Bulls; "But chiuauas bite people too!!" I COULD SQUAQSH A CHIUAUA LIKE A BUG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Besides the whole thread turned out to be some punk kid with two memberships set up and just trollling.
Stalking......Puuuuuleeeeese!!
OUT!!!!
Rumpaltin
Grand Master
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2007
- Messages
- 8
WOW is right: I never would have have guessed you would have gotten your panties in a bunch over that comment. But YES there is logic to that comment however someone with no logic in life would not understand that anyway.
In your post you specifically stated "Busted for Drunk Driving" I simply asked "how would you know if that person is drunk?" I don't disagree that a person weaving on the road is any more or less safe drunk, tired, or digging around on the floor of the car for something they dropped, hell maybe the person is going into diabetic shock or having an extreme allergic reaction to something they ate due to someone's mistake at the fast food joint they just left but that can't be, they are weaving all over the road so they must be drunk damn it.
You seem to be the type of person that would report someone for smoking a joint if you didn't see a filter on the end of a hand rolled cigarette because that must be what it is since it is twisted at the end and there is no filter.
Well done once again. You just log in every two years or so to give an old thread a poke?
Puuuuuuuulease once again. It's just one example of why somebody maybe needs to get stopped.
How about a nice edit for you: "....Troopers can check him out and catch him for drunk/sleepy/distracted/medically ill/general moron/ driving."
You miss the whole point, which was it is no more stalking to complain to FCC than it is to report an erratic driver that you witness.
Stretching it pretty thin there. (You sound like the type of person full of male cow excrement) LOL I'm not about to ring The Lads if I simply see somebody who appears to be puffin' on a crankin', but if I was behind them in the drive-thru and the odor of the smoke rolling out the windows was unmistakable I sure would, and have. Nothing illogical about that.
Sorry, There is still no logic to your argument "that person could be on his way home from a long day at work and tired." Doesn't matter if I assume he is weaving because of being drunk, reporting is the right thing to do so that somebody qualified and authorized can figure out why.
Puuuuuuuulease once again. It's just one example of why somebody maybe needs to get stopped.
How about a nice edit for you: "....Troopers can check him out and catch him for drunk/sleepy/distracted/medically ill/general moron/ driving."
You miss the whole point, which was it is no more stalking to complain to FCC than it is to report an erratic driver that you witness.
Stretching it pretty thin there. (You sound like the type of person full of male cow excrement) LOL I'm not about to ring The Lads if I simply see somebody who appears to be puffin' on a crankin', but if I was behind them in the drive-thru and the odor of the smoke rolling out the windows was unmistakable I sure would, and have. Nothing illogical about that.
Sorry, There is still no logic to your argument "that person could be on his way home from a long day at work and tired." Doesn't matter if I assume he is weaving because of being drunk, reporting is the right thing to do so that somebody qualified and authorized can figure out why.
- Status
