The problem is stockholders don't see the "Maker movement" as increasing their dividend checks. "Makers" don't buy things like cellphones and "value added services" that bring in residual income.
This is absolutely true... Most everything in your post is true. But...
The flaw many companies make is losing sight of the fact that, in order to generate the revenue required to pay dividends to stock holders, the company has to actually produce something that people want to buy. By produce, I mean manufacture, sell, service, or whatever...
In Radio Shack's case, the cellphone (etc.) markets have flattened out, so sales and profits are down. Otherwise, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
there is NO WAY the Fry's model would be profitable at that level that RS operates at.
I agree. Aside from the fact that they have way too many stores, they would need to come up with a business model of their own, not a copy of Fry's.
I'm sorry but Maker fairs just don't fit in that model at the scale of the operation they have.
I'm not ready to give in and agree with that. The Maker movement is growing. There are Makerspaces springing up all over the place. There are maker fairs taking place that are drawing a quarter of a million visitors in a single weekend. There is a LOT of buzz, at least in the circles I run around in.
It's not reasonable to expect a single market niche to revive a company like Radio Shack, but it's one of several that they should seriously look into tapping when they get around to reinventing themselves.
RS has to do what it can to be profitable and keep it's stockholders happy.
Yes, but in order to do that, they need customers. A whole segment of customers, people like us, has been alienated. I haven't spent a dime in a Radio Shack store in 15 years, because they don't carry what I want anymore. I can easily spend $1000 a year on parts for projects on my own, and not a penny of that goes to Radio Shack anymore. How would the shareholders feel to hear a few hundred thousand or a million stories like that?
Maker fairs, ham radio operators, and scanner enthusiasts are not known for big bucks.
Not by themselves, they aren't. But as part of a collectively larger customer base, they could be. if the Maker movement can show kids that building stuff is fun, schools could catch on and start teaching some of the things people are learning on their own. The idea isn't far fetched, and the movement IS growing, unlike cell phone sales.
If that were so, Best Buy would be carrying Baofengs and Wal Mart would carry Yaesu, and have a section of their stadium sized stores dedicated to Arduinos.
I will admit to having fairy-tale ambitions for things like the Makers, Makerspaces, community workspaces, and similar activities. I see those things as the saviors of the general electronics oriented hobbies. I think it would be foolish for a company as widely known throughout society as Radio Shack to ignore these organizations, and the growth potential it has.