• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Radtel RT-1000Pro

EAFrizzle

Bond. Ward Bond
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
1,391
Reaction score
2,187
Location
SE de DFW
Sold my 950 Pro due to no 6 meter or 220MHz TX capability.
Huh? The only places my 950Pro won't transmit is the Civil airband and FMBC above 100 MHz. Sure, 6 meter output power is puny, but 220 does fine.

ETA: I had a guy in another forum the other day telling me the 950 wouldn't transmit in V-Low around 43 MHz. Mine does just fine. Not sure why this would happen on the radio.
 
Last edited:

clovisb31

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
111
Reaction score
26
Location
Sanger,Ca.
Huh? The only places my 950Pro won't transmit is the Civil airband and FMBC above 100 MHz. Sure, 6 meter output power is puny, but 220 does fine.

ETA: I had a guy in another forum the other day telling me the 950 wouldn't transmit in V-Low around 43 MHz. Mine does just fine. Not sure why this would happen on the radio.
On a service monitor 6 meters was measured at less than 10 milliwatts. On 223.50 Mhz TX output was measured at about 50 milliwatts. I trust the service monitor. I also trust the local 223 Mhz repeater receiver. So the 950 Pro is WORTHLESS to me and I gave it the heave -ho. Hee-hee!
 

clovisb31

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
111
Reaction score
26
Location
Sanger,Ca.
Did you have the latest firmware update?
Yes. When I first received it, it was one version behind so I updated it to the latest version at that time. And as far as I know there were no firmware updates that dealt with a low power output condition on 6M/220Mhz.
 

buddrousa

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
14,765
Reaction score
10,688
Location
Retired 40 Year Firefighter NW Tenn
The thing to remember about Chinese Radios they are not called Cheap Chinese Radios for nothing.
I have 2 Radtels that are worthless to me a RT4D and a RT6D both only work about 30% of the time on DMR receive but both of my Baofeng DM32's work 100% tested against my Kenwood NX5200 and my Kenwood NX5300. Its not a programming issue they just are not reliable.
I use the CCR for receivers for Firefighter Families to listen to traffic when their Family member is at work and not have to spend $100's of dollars.
I use my RT 950Pro for amateur radio use.
 

clovisb31

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
111
Reaction score
26
Location
Sanger,Ca.
The thing to remember about Chinese Radios they are not called Cheap Chinese Radios for nothing.
I have 2 Radtels that are worthless to me a RT4D and a RT6D both only work about 30% of the time on DMR receive but both of my Baofeng DM32's work 100% tested against my Kenwood NX5200 and my Kenwood NX5300. Its not a programming issue they just are not reliable.
I use the CCR for receivers for Firefighter Families to listen to traffic when their Family member is at work and not have to spend $100's of dollars.
I use my RT 950Pro for amateur radio use.
I agree with you, and using your logic in a different way. I have a very expensive Kenwood handheld that includes 220 Mhz band. I live on a ranch and spend time in dirt,dust,on ATV's outside in rugged areas . I don't want to subject my Kenwood HT to these conditions. I need 223 Mhz for our local repeater. So a CCR with 223 mHZ IS PERFECT. So thinking the 950 Pro would be a great "throw down" radio for this use. But mine didn't work on 223 Mhz. Several of you report that it DOES.
This is good news. But not good enough for me to repurchase another one. I've alredy moved on to another CCR that claims
223 Mhz TX and has U-Boob videos showing that.
73
 

EAFrizzle

Bond. Ward Bond
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
1,391
Reaction score
2,187
Location
SE de DFW
I'm wondering if there was some manufacturing change in the 950 production run that's affecting transmit power. I know @buddrousa and I got ours within a day or two of each other just as they came out, so probably close on SN's.
 

DualTachyon

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2023
Messages
31
Reaction score
30
This has been known for many years, but it is worth repeating: Radtel only cares about selling new radios with fancy marketing to attract those unaware. They continue to not learn any lessons. The RT-4D had several months of debugging and customer feedback before they announced the RT-6D and RT-6D Pro. You would expect the 6D series to be a better evolution of the 4D, right? Same CPU, but colour screen, more features, etc. The reality is that the 6D firmware is actually worse than the one in the 4D, the UI is very slow, so many things are half baked. Whatever they fix on the 4D doesn't always land on the 6D. They also are planning on releasing a RT-5D that has little ressemblance to either the 4D or 6D, and from early feedback from private testers, it's a significant regression to either 4D or 6D. Worse CPS, very little features, half are half baked, etc. The 4D had the benefit that I found a crap ton of bugs and documented them in details for Radtel to fix, and it still took them sometimes a year or more for them to fix only SOME of them. Not to mention that when I explained a critical problem in deep details, with screenshots, logs, etc they replied "ok. let me know when you have information" completely ignored what I previously said.

To read that the RT-1000 Pro has 3 VFOs but only one tuner is.... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. People need to stop beliving the hype and vote with their wallets. Reading about stuff not working properly is also no surprise, it is their modus operandi. It usualy takes 6 months or more for their firmware to fix many basic problems. Stuff like "APRS is dedicated to VFO C, but when I press PTT goes to the current VFO" is an old bug from at least 1 or 2 years ago that they never fixed on other radios.

Stop supporting a company that keeps half-baking everything they sell.
 
Top