Question....why didn't Roanoke have one 800 mhz. trs with the county and city users having unique and common talkgroups? Why all this Rube Goldberg method of operation?
The reasons date all the way back to the beginning of the Roanoke TRS. The county wanted to go trunking, but the city could not afford their end. The county made the switch over with a Type I SmartNet system and then the city tacked on a couple of years later. When that happend, they added two more sites to accomodate the city, as well as improve coverage for the county.
When the city came on, Type I systems were no longer shipping, so the city had to go Type II. This was a problem since the county was already Type I. They merged the two to become a Type I/II hybrid system. Those who were scanning back then remember the old custom fleet map that we had to program our scanners with...block size codes. When the city upgraded several years ago, they made a switch over to the Type II and essentially removed the need for the I/II hybrid infrastructure. At the same time, every site was upgraded to ALL Quantar stations and other upgrades were made to the controllers.
The city and county dispatch centers are still "linked" together with an ambasador interface. Basically a giant audio switch.
Looks like the P25 upgrade is going to go kind of the same way things did all of those years ago with the switch to trunking. Each area had to make their move when it was financially feasable.
Salem was offered a chance to get into the Roanoke TRS a while back, but their arrogance kept them from doing it. That is why they are still running conventional Motorola repeaters on Ft. Lewis mountain and the water tower in the middle of town. I know, because I helped put those repeaters into service. Salem was the WORST and most DIFFICULT city I had ever worked with in the two-way industry.