• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

RT-950 Pro v. RT-880: some early thoughts

EAFrizzle

Bond. Ward Bond
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
1,434
Location
SE de DFW
Had a 950 for about a day now, and I'm very happy with it. I'm not yet sure about the single antenna jack. Since I use mine for monitoring, having to change antennas/use a diplexer isn't as convenient as just having two antennas connected.

The 880 allows you to select Work Bands for each VFO individually; the 950 is a global setting for all 3 VFOs, meaning you can only have 64 - 999 MHz or 18 - 64 MHz available while in work mode. This can be accommodated a bit in Test Mode, but 18 - 64 is restricted to VFO C, and you lose the ability to dual watch from the HF receiver.

The HF section of the 950 seems a bit better than the 880, which was already good. A telescopic whip easily picks up international broadcasters while letting you hear local V/U traffic. SSB is clear and easy to tune in. AM and FM BCB performance is excellent, it did well on some MW DXing last night.

The audio is as you'd expect for an HT with a small internal speaker: limited in dynamic range. It's not bad audio at all; crisp and clear with pronounced mids and upper-mids. While it's not audiophile quality, the compressed range lets it cut though background noise and hearing loss more easily. AM audio in the transceiver section is especially good, making the 950 another great choice for airband listeners.

Other people have written plenty about the transceivers on ham bands and repeaters. All I have to add to that is that both are very clean transmitters with no objectionable spurious emissions as viewed with a tinySA.

If you're a Railroad or Airband fan, the 950 or the 880 is a great choice for monitoring or scanning a small zone list. You can also monitor HF or listen to a broadcast at the same time. Both are around $75 on Amazon right now for the 950 Pro and the 880G. Keep an eye out for deals on the 880 as the holidays approach. If it drops another 15-20 dollars, it's well worth grabbing.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,787
Reaction score
9,873
Location
Central Indiana
Can either radio monitor two VHF or two UHF frequencies simultaneously? Not talking about dual watch, but actual dual receive.
 

EAFrizzle

Bond. Ward Bond
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
1,434
Location
SE de DFW
Another thing is antenna choice for HF. My 880 and 860, along with some SDRs and SDR-based receivers tend to do better with an active or amplified antenna; not a horrible difference in performance, but noticeable. The 950 is doing great on the LoG, better than either of the other Radtels.

When you consider that you can transcieve from 999 MHz down to 18 MHz, receive well on MW/SW/FMBC (I don't know how well the LW works), and with a passive, unamplified signal out of  one connector, the 950 definitely has some interesting circuitry in that chain.
 

EAFrizzle

Bond. Ward Bond
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
1,434
Location
SE de DFW
I don't know about the 950 yet, but my 880 will receive on all 3 VFOs simultaneously. No way to balance or shift volume, but it does actually hear them. On the 880 you just assign your VFO to whichever work band you need, and start listening.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,787
Reaction score
9,873
Location
Central Indiana
I don't know about the 950 yet, but my 880 will receive on all 3 VFOs simultaneously.
I probably should have been more clear. Can you set two VFOs to the same band?
 

EAFrizzle

Bond. Ward Bond
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
1,434
Location
SE de DFW
On the 880, yes, they can be set to any of the work bands, so you could have V-Lo, UHF, and 900 all on VFOs, or any combination thereof.
 

mdevoe

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
12
Location
mi
Is the GPS usefull for anything besides arps? Is there any advantage of getting a 950 pro over 880 standard for receive and transmit. I know the 950 pro has a faster cpu but does that really make any difference. I like listening to 40m band and local ems and I also use gmrs everyday. Thanks
 

EAFrizzle

Bond. Ward Bond
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
1,434
Location
SE de DFW
No idea about the GPS as I don't use that. The faster chipsets boot and run the functions faster on the 950 than the 880, but I doubt you'll notice any difference on receive or transmit on the transceiver section. The SW reception is better on the 950 and the 950 boots immediately v. ~2 seconds for the 880. They're basically the same price right now, so no reason to get the 880 instead of the 950. The 880 is becoming an orphan project compared to the marketing and support for the 950, so that's another thing to consider.

Right now, I wouldn't get an 880 with the 950 basically the same price. If they drop that price 15-20 dollars, the 880 is well worth grabbing.
 
Top