The N groups are still listed in the database?7P/8P/9P are all the same TG. ID 321.
7N/8N/9N and 7O/8O/9O are all deprecated talkgroups. All have been replaced with conventional frequencies as noted.
The N groups are still listed in the database?7P/8P/9P are all the same TG. ID 321.
7N/8N/9N and 7O/8O/9O are all deprecated talkgroups. All have been replaced with conventional frequencies as noted.
527 | 20f | D | TAC 7N | Tac 7N |
397 | 18d | D | RIC 8N | Rapid Intervention Crew 8N |
507 | 1fb | D | TAC 9N | Tac 9N |
I suspect they did away with structure vs. vegetation on the trunking system because large veg fires are supposed to go VHF on the XSD command and tac channels. But in my experience they tend to get dispatched out on the regular incident talkgroups with the addition of XSD Command 4 (formerly SND CMD) and XSD A/G.
Note that the following talkgroups are out of date and should have been SDMA10, SDMA20 and SDMA30 instead:
527 20f D TAC 7N Tac 7N
397 18d D RIC 8N Rapid Intervention Crew 8N
507 1fb D TAC 9N Tac 9N
You are correct. The "N" talkgroups are no longer in use. SDFD radios no longer carry these talkgroups. That does not mean that some of the other agencies that have not reprogrammed to a newer fleetmap don't still have them. But they are not used, assigned, and don't exist on SDFD radio consoles.Of course a day after writing this, I heard two vegetation initial attacks dispatched by SDFR on 8G/8H and 9G/9H which were in the south of I-8 and north of I-8 zones respectively. It's possible they use the "secondary" command/tac pair for vegetation initial attack, leaving the primary open for structure fires. The other option is both 8A/8B and 9A/9B were in use at the time, but I didn't notice any traffic on either.
Just to follow up, I have seen no evidence of these 7N, 8N, 9N talkgroups being used, so I've deleted them from the 700 MHz system.
Of course a day after writing this, I heard two vegetation initial attacks dispatched by SDFR on 8G/8H and 9G/9H which were in the south of I-8 and north of I-8 zones respectively. It's possible they use the "secondary" command/tac pair for vegetation initial attack, leaving the primary open for structure fires. The other option is both 8A/8B and 9A/9B were in use at the time, but I didn't notice any traffic on either.
Vegetation Fires - 8G/8H North of the 8, 9G/9H South of the 8. If one is in use already CAD or the Dispatcher should select the other. Ex. second veg fire south of the 8 should be assigned 9G/9H.
All other multi-unit responses - North of 8, in order, 9A/9B, 9D/9E, 9J/9K. South of 8 in order - 8A/8B, 8D/8E, 8J/8K.
None of this is in stone. If command/tac pairs start running out south of the 8 CAD or a Dispatcher will start assigning pairs from the other pool. This includes assigning the vegetation fire channels to non-vegetation fires if needed.
I would not make changes to the database based on anything you see on that document.
This is how I thought it was but the descriptions were recently changed in the DB? I'd reccomend bringing back a note of this to the descriptions.
If the N talkgroups are possibly deprecated can anyone confirm or deny this? I know they are not in my fleetmap for the North Zone.You are correct. The "N" talkgroups are no longer in use. SDFD radios no longer carry these talkgroups. That does not mean that some of the other agencies that have not reprogrammed to a newer fleetmap don't still have them. But they are not used, assigned, and don't exist on SDFD radio consoles.
The last time I heard the M/A talkgroups used was about 3-4 years ago when the SDFD copter was talking with SDPD units on the ground coordinating possible evacuations/threats during an overnight hillside brush fire...other than that, have never ever heard them utilized.You are correct. The "N" talkgroups are no longer in use. SDFD radios no longer carry these talkgroups. That does not mean that some of the other agencies that have not reprogrammed to a newer fleetmap don't still have them. But they are not used, assigned, and don't exist on SDFD radio consoles.
Vegetation Fires - 8G/8H North of the 8, 9G/9H South of the 8. If one is in use already CAD or the Dispatcher should select the other. Ex. second veg fire south of the 8 should be assigned 9G/9H.
All other multi-unit responses - North of 8, in order, 9A/9B, 9D/9E, 9J/9K. South of 8 in order - 8A/8B, 8D/8E, 8J/8K.
None of this is in stone. If command/tac pairs start running out south of the 8 CAD or a Dispatcher will start assigning pairs from the other pool. This includes assigning the vegetation fire channels to non-vegetation fires if needed.
I have not noticed any issues lately. I did notice that the problem radio ID did follow where there was major incident's tac channel, so I do believe I had heard it on 8B as well that same day.I have had 9B locked out of my scanlists for over a week, is it still having the issue?
Paul