Sorry put you are short facts and all parks are used state wide so these exist.
Come on man, the coverage area of a system isn't in doubt, but the coverage area of a SITE is. A system is made up of sites. I know for a fact, that the SDS200 only scans SITES that are within the range set via the location range setting in the menu.Sorry put you are short facts and all parks are used state wide so these exist.
You apparently modified it, I just pulled it from the database, range is 20 to 25 miles for all sites
UHF is line of sight, the curvature of the earth limits line of sight to about 25 miles for any single tower (site) over relatively level ground.
I did say ".. you apparently modified it.." I should have said ".. It is wrong...". For that, I apologize.
I just looked up all western Tennessee trunked sites belonging to the Tennessee Advanced Communications Network (TACN) and all sites show between 15 and 25 miles.
And you and I both know a single UHF site can not cover a 480 mile diameter circle (240 mile range)
Thus.. My original, "show me a 350 mile range on a UHF site and I will show you a lie" is correct... That value is wrong, it's not possible at ground level.
Only speaking of Colorado. Statewide agencies can use their radios anywhere in the state a tower and that radio are associated. Now yes, some towers are "reserved" for specific sets of talkgroups but that's mostly along heavily congested areas... Say, the Colorado Springs to Fort Collins "corridor"I think the point is the way some agencies are structured in the database they have to have a statewide "range". The fix I guess would be to breakdown the individual divisions based on county or region served. If trunked then system-wide TG's would still need the "range" of the complete system of course.
I have the same issue in my state and it sucks when a frequency has a 150 mile range and no PL/DPL/NAC.
Show me a fire or police dept (all I listen to) with a 350 mile range on their transmitter sites and I will show you a lie. 🙄
I said "transmitter" and by "lie" I mean an untruth, not anything evil or fraudulent.I can describe one: The State of Wherever has a car-to-car channel that is used statewide and Wherever is 350 miles in radius.
No, not any single transmitter will reach that far (generally speaking) but the network of transmitters will.
Now, does any given state have a 350 mile radius? I don't believe so, but that was not the challenge.![]()
I said "transmitter" and by "lie" I mean an untruth, not anything evil or fraudulent.
I suspect, but don't know, Alaska will have a 350 mile radius.
What would be the purpose of showing the "range" of a SYSTEM. Systems are made of sites (xmiter towers) and individual sites certainly have a range where their signal can be reasonably received. If I am not within reception range of any site within that system, yet am in "range" of that system... Who cares? And finally, where is that system "range" calculated from? Let's take Tennessee, Tennessee is 432 miles wide... East to West, but only 112 miles high North to South. Is the range 216 miles or is it 56 miles? Does it mean anything or matter?
I believe range for a system is a meaningless value.
I have the same setup. What I do for the times I'm actually driving is I use the GPS and set the range to "0" knowing that it's going to load systems that won't be close to where I am and maybe not be able to hear at all. If I happen to hear something of interest I just lock that channel for a while. If I know where I may be spending some time I program FLs for those areas. Probably won't work for everyone but it does for me.
Joe,I guess it depends if you want to hear that user or not.
As for what 'range' means, RR defined that. I believe it loosely comes out to: The range for which the information presented is relevant.
In my example: Wherever PD/FD/AnythingElse.
If you are within range of where they use their car-to-car channel, it would seem to apply.
I also know that some people think range should be the transmitter range. This is not how it is used in this context.
In many cases, the range of Othertown is say 5 miles (city center to the edge of their service area) even if their transmitter covers 25 miles. Again, this is the range where the data is relevant - not the range of a single transmitter.
So, when you look at "range" as "service area where that channel may be used", it starts to make more sense, no?
Oh, and TN would be a range of 216 only if it were less than 1 mile tall. Since it is 110 miles tall, the range would be 242 from the center if I did the math right. (You don't want to cut off the corners)
I didn't make these terms, but I think I have an understanding of them. (Admin please feel free to correct me)
What is the algorithm (in simple terms) that Uniden uses to determine what systems and sites it will scan as you move about.
I would think (but obvious don't know) that it would build a rectangle (or circle) around me, use my setting for range, find all sites where range intersects with my "rectangle" and scan any sites that carried my selected service types.
Anyway whatever algorithm it's using, it works for me.
Here's a link to the 'How it works' article.The algorithm is: Does your set range in the scanner overlap the range of the Site/Department? If it does it is included.
Four examples:
Your range is 15 miles and the system is 45 miles away with a 25 mile range. You will not scan it. (25+15=40 = you are not within the limit)
Your range is 15 miles and the system is 35 miles away with a 25 mile range. You will scan it. (25+15=40 = you are within the limit)
Your range is 0 miles and the system is 45 miles away with a 25 mile range. You will not scan it. (25+0=25 = you are not within the limit)
Your range is 0 miles and the system is 35 miles away with a 40 mile range. You will scan it. (40+0=40 = you are within the limit)
Basically, set to a 0 mile range the system has to cover where you are. There is a fudge factor because we are dealing with circles and geopolitical areas are almost never circles, but it should come out close. If your range is set to 15 miles, you have to be within 15 miles of the service area of that user.
You set the range in the scanner you want to hear. RR sets the system's service area range (which is different than the RF range). The RF range might be (and probably will be) greater than the service area range. So if you think the service area range is wrong for a Site/Dept, you have to report that to RR. Of course for trunked systems you have cells that may have lower RF range than the service area.
Paul Opitz wrote an article called "Location, location, location" that goes through this very well.
Thank you... That helps.The algorithm is: Does your set range in the scanner overlap the range of the Site/Department? If it does it is included.
Four examples:
Your range is 15 miles and the system is 45 miles away with a 25 mile range. You will not scan it. (25+15=40 = you are not within the limit)
Your range is 15 miles and the system is 35 miles away with a 25 mile range. You will scan it. (25+15=40 = you are within the limit)
Your range is 0 miles and the system is 45 miles away with a 25 mile range. You will not scan it. (25+0=25 = you are not within the limit)
Your range is 0 miles and the system is 35 miles away with a 40 mile range. You will scan it. (40+0=40 = you are within the limit)
Basically, set to a 0 mile range the system has to cover where you are. There is a fudge factor because we are dealing with circles and geopolitical areas are almost never circles, but it should come out close. If your range is set to 15 miles, you have to be within 15 miles of the service area of that user.
You set the range in the scanner you want to hear. RR sets the system's service area range (which is different than the RF range). The RF range might be (and probably will be) greater than the service area range. So if you think the service area range is wrong for a Site/Dept, you have to report that to RR. Of course for trunked systems you have cells that may have lower RF range than the service area.
Paul Opitz wrote an article called "Location, location, location" that goes through this very well.