• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Sirio Starduster

Status
Not open for further replies.

ke6ats

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
117
Reaction score
42
Curious if anyone has used a Sirio Starduster. For reference, I have zero interest in skip. Just looking to be able to make contacts with friends within a range of 5-20 miles. Thoughts?
 

K6GBW

Off Grid Kid
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
1,156
Reaction score
2,132
Location
Montebello, CA
The Sirio Starduster is basically a quarter wave ground plane. It is a very simple antenna and works very well. But as a quarter wave ground plane it doesn't have much gain. If you want to use your CB radio for local contacts then an antenna with more gain would give you better performance. Understand that 5-12 miles is a more realistic range for ground wave on a CB radio. An antenna like a 5/8 wave, such as the Maco or one of the Solarcon Max Optimizer or even the A99 would give you better performance. That said, if you do decide to go with the Star Duster you won't be disappointed. It's a good antenna with a simple design. I've found that simple designs can be a real bonus. There's less to go wrong over time.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,647
Reaction score
14,823
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
The Starduster design sort of approaches a coaxial sleeve dipole when the radials are angled down that far and it may behave more like a dipole than a ground plane, which has a little less gain. If you want to stick with Sirio I’ve installed a version similar to their newer Blizzard 2700 and was impressed with its construction and performance. The 2700 will work better than the Starduster.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
4,473
Reaction score
4,490
Location
Fort Worth
Curious if anyone has used a Sirio Starduster. For reference, I have zero interest in skip. Just looking to be able to make contacts with friends within a range of 5-20 miles. Thoughts?

Substitute Skip for War. It can be a bear.

IMG_4990.jpeg

Think of SSB as where it’s fun try for long-distance contacts. Or extending local radius.

Was leaving ABQ one morning up into the Sandia Mtns on IH40. One of my fellows back in town still getting unloaded. We were fine on AM till about 9-miles. Switched to Sideband and stayed in contact for nearly 30-miles.

.
 

ke6ats

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
117
Reaction score
42
Thanks for the input y'all. (And for some reason I completely forgot about SSB). :rolleyes:
 

Blackswan73

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
1,672
Reaction score
580
Location
Central Indiana
Stardusters are a low radiation antenna. Not as good for skip as the Big Stick, A99, Workman and similar style antennas. On SSB I could regularly talk out to 35-40 miles with my starduster. My A99 would never talk that far on ground wave. For a mobile I never found an antenna that worked better for me than a Hustler HQ-27. Truckers used to run Hustlers in a dual configuration. Hams also liked the ham version of the Hustler center loaded
antenna
If you wanted a base antenna that would reach out and touch someone, most of the big operators ran the Moonraker by AS, or the “Big Gun”. I don’t remember who made that one

B.S.
 
Last edited:

MissouriRebel

Newbie
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
12
Reaction score
32
Location
Missouri
Stardusters are a low radiation antenna. Not as good for skip as the Big Stick, A99, Workman and similar style antennas. On SSB I could regularly talk out to 35-40 miles with my starduster. My A99 would never talk that far on ground wave. For a mobile I never found an antenna that worked better for me than a Hustler HQ-27. Truckers used to run Hustlers in a dual configuration. Hams also liked the ham version of the Hustler center loaded
antenna
If you wanted a base antenna that would reach out and touch someone, most of the big operators ran the Moonraker by AS, or the “Big Gun”. I don’t remember who made that one

B.S.
I think it was made by Hygain , because there was also a Big Gun II. CBTricks can tell you in their antenna section .
 

FPR1981

Active Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2021
Messages
621
Reaction score
520
Stardusters are a low radiation antenna. Not as good for skip as the Big Stick, A99, Workman and similar style antennas. On SSB I could regularly talk out to 35-40 miles with my starduster. My A99 would never talk that far on ground wave. For a mobile I never found an antenna that worked better for me than a Hustler HQ-27. Truckers used to run Hustlers in a dual configuration. Hams also liked the ham version of the Hustler center loaded
antenna
If you wanted a base antenna that would reach out and touch someone, most of the big operators ran the Moonraker by AS, or the “Big Gun”. I don’t remember who made that one

B.S.

Theoretically, one might think they wouldn't talk as well for skip, but I gifted one to a former CBer in town whose wife died and he was left alone. He successfully makes skip contacts as much or more than anyone in town on 5/8-wave ground planes and A99's. The amount of skip contacts he makes is astonishing.

Another guy in town has a 1/4-wave vertical with wire radials coming off it, and that guy lands skip contacts like a fool also. I've yet to find anyone with a 1/4-wave ground plane in town who isn't killing it on skip. For what that's worth.

And that's why I put one up as well. I've never been overly excited about talking skip, but I never have any issues with mine. Mine also does wonderful for local.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,647
Reaction score
14,823
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I think it was made by Hygain , because there was also a Big Gun II. CBTricks can tell you in their antenna section .
The Starduster was originally made by Antenna Specialists.
That's the benefit of a 1/4 wave vertical antenna: higher signal takeoff angle
The height above ground will probably have more to do with the takeoff angle than the type of vertical antenna like 1/4 wave ground plane vs 5/8, etc. A 1/4 wave ground plane with the feed point at 18 or 36ft off the ground should easily outperform a 1/2 wave or 5/8 wave where the current max is 10ft or 25ft off the ground. And a Starduster is not a 1/4 wave antenna, its a center fed half wave.
 

lamarrsy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 12, 2003
Messages
247
Reaction score
217
Location
Rimouski, PQ, Canada
Way back in my CB days, I had an M-400 (similar to the now Sirio Starduster), and I concur what Blackswan73 said, as I had strong and far reach local signal with that antenna ! (Wasn’t interested in skip).
Later I replaced it with a « Big Stick » 18ft version, placed on the same mast, and gee have I regretted the change ! I was getting full skip and my local coverage vanished.

I am thinking of getting a Sirio Starduster, just to experience again that sweet local / regional coverage !
 

robertwbob

KE0WRU
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
640
Reaction score
630
Location
Northeast jasper county,missouri
i got a sirio 2008 at 30 feet ground to base of antenna. using my stryker sr 955 hp i talk 48 miles to friends in springfield mo. and its took some harsh winds too. had it down this spring to ins[ect after last real bad storm we had.all parts are still tight.
i like this antenna well.not as noisy as my A99 and recives great too
 

robertwbob

KE0WRU
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
640
Reaction score
630
Location
Northeast jasper county,missouri
Stardusters are a low radiation antenna. Not as good for skip as the Big Stick, A99, Workman and similar style antennas. On SSB I could regularly talk out to 35-40 miles with my starduster. My A99 would never talk that far on ground wave. For a mobile I never found an antenna that worked better for me than a Hustler HQ-27. Truckers used to run Hustlers in a dual configuration. Hams also liked the ham version of the Hustler center loaded
antenna
If you wanted a base antenna that would reach out and touch someone, most of the big operators ran the Moonraker by AS, or the “Big Gun”. I don’t remember who made that one

B.S.
yes hustler is a great mobile antenna. mx 210 on my pickup.talks long range on 2 meters from kenwood g 707
and blue center coil hustler for 11 meters on same pickup
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top