Any reason why the Stanley Canyon TRS Site suddenly does not work? CC 853.7125 nor are any alternate CCs show any activity now.
Stanley Canyon TRS Site
- Thread starter radio
- Start date
- Status
OK Thank you.
I switched over to Cedar Heights. For some strange reason, I am closer to Austin Buffs than Cedar Heights but get a much stronger signal for Cedar Heights..
I switched over to Cedar Heights. For some strange reason, I am closer to Austin Buffs than Cedar Heights but get a much stronger signal for Cedar Heights..
No problem.
Looking through my data dump file, it looks like Stanley Canyon changes on the CC freq neighbor broadcast this morning were...
From the normal 853.71250 to 853.38750 at 10:08:18 am but was still connected.
Then changed from 853.38750 to 852.85000 at 10:11:52 am but was still connected.
Then changed from 852.85000 to 852.61250 at 10:14:36 am and was connected until 10:17:00 am.
Either those were automatic fail-safe changes due to some kind of equipment problem or they are doing maintenance.
We'll have to see what other changes were made when the site comes back up.
Looking through my data dump file, it looks like Stanley Canyon changes on the CC freq neighbor broadcast this morning were...
From the normal 853.71250 to 853.38750 at 10:08:18 am but was still connected.
Then changed from 853.38750 to 852.85000 at 10:11:52 am but was still connected.
Then changed from 852.85000 to 852.61250 at 10:14:36 am and was connected until 10:17:00 am.
Either those were automatic fail-safe changes due to some kind of equipment problem or they are doing maintenance.
We'll have to see what other changes were made when the site comes back up.
Spitfire8520
I might be completely clueless! =)
Maybe the site will come back up as part of Zone 6?!?!? Nah, that's probably a little far fetched.
That aside, perhaps Stanley Canyon is undergoing a repeater replacement. There have been notes from the CCNC that they were working in replacing/updating repeaters for different sites which will cause downtime. They also noted that non-state owned sites need to plan on replacing older repeaters with new ones due to the Motorola Lifecycle Roadmap.
That aside, perhaps Stanley Canyon is undergoing a repeater replacement. There have been notes from the CCNC that they were working in replacing/updating repeaters for different sites which will cause downtime. They also noted that non-state owned sites need to plan on replacing older repeaters with new ones due to the Motorola Lifecycle Roadmap.
Whatever issues it had, I see it has come back on the same 853.7125 control channel. We shall see what happens now.
Interesting that they brought it back up in the reverse order, cycling through the CC freq/channels.
It has been failed and showing 852.61250 (on neighbor sites) as the CC (even though it was not transmitting on any CC) since just after 10 am.
At 4:12 pm, the Stanley Canyon site came back up and was transmitting on CC freq of 852.61250.
Then at 4:15 pm, the CC freq changed to 852.85000 still transmitting.
Then at 4:18 pm, the CC freq changed to 853.38750 still transmitting.
Then at 4:21 pm, the CC freq changed to 853.71250 still transmitting.
Maybe this is the way they bring down and bring back up a site for maintenance.
It has been failed and showing 852.61250 (on neighbor sites) as the CC (even though it was not transmitting on any CC) since just after 10 am.
At 4:12 pm, the Stanley Canyon site came back up and was transmitting on CC freq of 852.61250.
Then at 4:15 pm, the CC freq changed to 852.85000 still transmitting.
Then at 4:18 pm, the CC freq changed to 853.38750 still transmitting.
Then at 4:21 pm, the CC freq changed to 853.71250 still transmitting.
Maybe this is the way they bring down and bring back up a site for maintenance.
IDK if its my radios or my hearing, but since Stanley Canyon site cam back on,my radios appear to be working better. Much clearer audio, talk group tracking is crisp instead of choppy. Hope it stays that way!
- Status
Similar threads
