Sticky Thread For Mid-Atlantic MilAir 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mark

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 14, 2001
Messages
14,009
Location
Northeast Maryland

wbagley

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
1,632
Location
Near Louisville, Kentucky
The U.S. Navy says it has determined that a modified C-130J-30 Hercules turboprop airlifter is the best available platform to provide airborne command and control support for America's nuclear deterrent forces, including relaying orders to carry out a nuclear strike or even remotely initiating the launch of intercontinental ballistic missiles from their silos. A fleet of E-6B Mercury jets, modified versions of the Boeing 707 airliner, that are commonly referred to as "doomsday planes," presently fulfill this mission. It's a role known as Take Charge and Move Out, or TACAMO. The E-6Bs had replaced an earlier EC-130Q aircraft just over 30 years ago.

Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) revealed the results of its so-called "analysis of alternatives" in a notice it issued on Dec. 18, 2020. That posting on the U.S. government's official contracting website beta.SAM.gov also announced the service's intent to acquire up to three C-130J-30s for TACAMO test purposes via a sole-source deal with Lockheed Martin, the aircraft's manufacturer.

The Navy's Wants To Go Back To Flying The C-130 Hercules As Its Next Doomsday Plane (thedrive.com)
 

Mark

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 14, 2001
Messages
14,009
Location
Northeast Maryland
Last edited:

morfis

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
1,669
Remember that is Lockheed proposal.. I'm sure Boeing and others will be along for their replacements also.
I'm not so sure a slow prop aircraft will be the final choice. I'm betting on a speedy pax type jet variant like the E-7 wedge type tail
replacement for the E-3B.

With the E-6 joint mission and training hours the frames are getting hammered. Splitting the submarine comms to a different frame would make quite a lot of sense in the short term and that's where a herc could really score. The base platform is up to date and with good endurance, well suited to very low level flight to mission area and can be operated from just about any field. Add in the wide availability of maintenance facilities and the experience Lockheed have from the EC-130J Commando Solo (or whatever you call it) and progress from design to flight would be quicker and cheaper than most other base frames. This would give time for design of a new combined role E-4/E-6 replacement machine......

...always options...the only certain thing is the politicians and businessmen will make a bigger wad than ever ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top