iamhere300
Member
I can't be certain about size, but it is the lightest all band radio on the market
I can't be certain about size, but it is the lightest all band radio on the market
For some reason a lot of the TP9600's were sold with a 2,400 mAh battery. The wildland version has a 3,300 mAh battery. On the bigger battery we get up to 27 hours on the TP9600 (5,5,90 TDMA). Obviously this comes down a bit on the TP9800 as it draws a bit more, and analog or non-TDMA brings it down a bit more, as does real world usage.Curious to see how the battery life is. I know the TP9600's are just "eh".
Still waiting on our demo units, like everything there has been a delay.
Having both sitting here on my desk listening to a VHF conventional/analog system that is just on my fringe. It's hard to tell the difference between the two radios. They both receive essentially the same. If one didn't need the WiFi/LTE of the XL-200p (Tait is said to be working on a solution), I'd prefer the Tait just based on ergonomics and price. I think when the 9900 comes out, they'll really have themselves well established in the market. Pretty amazing how far the industry has come in the last few years. A 136-941MHz portable radio with P25 and DMR is really an amazing thing.
Rumor is JVCK paid Tait to develop a LTE "hotspot" RSM to accomplish such a task on the VP8000 after they learned how poorly received (i.e. lost sales) their decision to not include LTE in the VP8000 (overriding EFJ's criteria for it to be in there). Also in typical JVCK fashion, there is not any legal documents to keep Tait from using the RSM developed...or at least that's the rumor.
For all the VP6/8000's thickness, it is still substantially smaller and lighter than legacy 5100, VP6/900, and XTS5000 portables, even when the older radios use Li-ion batteries. Really it's impressive how well the industry has scaled things down over the last decade.here’s a couple more photos compared to the VP8000 and APX, it’s not even close in size.
It is in fact the same chassis as the 9600
View attachment 156770
View attachment 156772
Tait's engineering in general is intriguing, unfortunately I don't know of any dealers in this area so we're buying VP6000s in small quantities for underground equipment operators. Tait DMR portables would likely take a bite out of Motorola's market share on ergonomics alone; they're a favorite of Australian mining for a reason.
Sadly, with systems like Capacity Plus/Connect Plus/Capacity Max Advantage out there, Tait and Kenwood are at a disadvantage. It's a pipe dream, but standards compliant networks would really level the field
A large site near me (coincidentally owned by an Australian outfit) put in a DMRA-standard Tier 3 system, subscribers are a mix of Motorola and Kenwood. It's a breath of fresh air from the CP/CM junk some operators use. Public safety in that county uses VHF P25 conventional; I could see local fire/rescue purchasing TP9900s or VP8000s (or their eventual mobile counterparts) for interoperability. The CM sites end up mounting two radios in their trucks.Tait is a really underrated.
With Kenwood, Tait and BK bringing multi/all band radios to the market are going to take a good market share from Motorola and Harris.
There are lots of fire departments that are still analogue conventional, DMR conventional. Kenwood and Tait are game changers for those departments that need to interoperate with users on other bands and/or trunking systems.
Sadly, with systems like Capacity Plus/Connect Plus/Capacity Max Advantage out there, Tait and Kenwood are at a disadvantage. It's a pipe dream, but standards compliant networks would really level the field
Tait is very underrated, and from what I've found a lot of agencies have never heard of them.Tait is a really underrated.
With Kenwood, Tait and BK bringing multi/all band radios to the market are going to take a good market share from Motorola and Harris.
There are lots of fire departments that are still analogue conventional, DMR conventional. Kenwood and Tait are game changers for those departments that need to interoperate with users on other bands and/or trunking systems.
Sadly, with systems like Capacity Plus/Connect Plus/Capacity Max Advantage out there, Tait and Kenwood are at a disadvantage. It's a pipe dream, but standards compliant networks would really level the field
key word is SMART, if it is logically or makes sense then throw it out the window....If APCO and others were smart, they'd start coming up with Project type standards that strongly discouraged these sorts of proprietary systems. They kind of tried to with P25, but it would be nice if it had some teeth.
I think any agency that sets up a system that locks users into one brand radio gets exactly what they deserve. There's enough knowledge out there to know this is a really bad idea. Unfortunately there seem to be too many that are afraid of the salesmen.
Can I help you find a Tait dealer?For all the VP6/8000's thickness, it is still substantially smaller and lighter than legacy 5100, VP6/900, and XTS5000 portables, even when the older radios use Li-ion batteries. Really it's impressive how well the industry has scaled things down over the last decade.
Regarding the LTE speaker mic, I've always liked Tait's approach with the Axiom (and the discrete module on the XL). Allowing an LTE carrier direct, OS-level access to a subscriber radio has never sat well with me, we're a small enough operator that we can't realistically benefit from OTAP and proprietary MCPTT, so LTE is a security vulnerability rather than a value add.
Tait's engineering in general is intriguing, unfortunately I don't know of any dealers in this area so we're buying VP6000s in small quantities for underground equipment operators. Tait DMR portables would likely take a bite out of Motorola's market share on ergonomics alone; they're a favorite of Australian mining for a reason.