I have an SDS200. It’s very good on p25 digital, and in the case of simulcast p25 it’s much better than any previous scanner model. I know South Sound 911 has some simulcast, not sure about the other digital systems in your area, but I can’t imagine Seattle is going to remain analog forever. When they do go to digital it will almost certainly be simulcast. So the SDS is the most ‘future proof’ scanner available right now. One of the problems with digital though is it makes it easier for law enforcement to encrypt their transmissions. I’m not saying that will happen with Seattle, I have no idea, but it did happen in my area in Clark County Washington when they went digital. Perhaps someone in your area can chime in with more info on that topic, but it’s clear that encryption has been a growing trend across the country as digital systems have replaced analog ones. And of course no scanner can, or ever will be able to decode it. Fire & Medical often remain in the clear however. One drawback with the SDS is that it can be less than stellar on weaker analog VHF and UHF signals. It’s not that it lacks sensitivity, it’s more an issue of selectively, or in other words an inability to properly filter out interference from strong signals nearby in the radio spectrum. Uniden has released some firmware upgrades with filtering options that help address this, but they don’t work for everyone in every situation. Whether you’ll have problems really depends on what you’re trying to monitor and what your unique radio environment is like. If you live in a signal-dense area like a big city you might have more issues with analog than if you’re out in the tulies.
.