MrRadio
Member
So I've only had my SDS100 (first SDS scanner) since 12/27/19 but I'm so pleased with it, I had to post.
I primarily purchased this for listening to my local public safety systems in the middle of an EXTREMELY challenging RF environment.
My BCD325P2 was missing 30-80% of the traffic on my local trunked systems due to simulcast/LSM in my immediate area. It was so bad, it was basically useless for my location. Years ago, my BC780's, 785's, 796's and BCD396 worked great, but that was before simulcast was a problem in my area.
While my Unication G5 works wonders for this issue, you can only monitor 1 trunked system at a time with it. Also, there is no channel/talkgroup delay and it's very limited in "banks", "channels" etc. so it makes a poor choice for someone that wants to monitor more than 1 trunked system and/or dozens of talkgroups simultaniously.
After using the the SDS100 for just 3 days, I can honestly say it is EXCELLENT at handling simulcast/LSM issues in challenging RF areas. I will add that in addition to 700-800Mhz trunked systems, there are numerous radio transmitters of many bands in my area (about 4 miles from the home of Motorola)
This is comparing it to my G5 on the same systems. The SDS100 might miss 1/2 second of the beginning of a transmission but the G5 is parked on the control channel so it has a slight advantage.
I will try to write a short review at some point (after I have more time with the radio). For now however, I wanted to let anyone that was thinking about purchasing an SDS100, it should be excellent in bad simulcast areas. It works so well, I am thinking about adding an SDS200 at some point.
A big shout out to Uniden and Paul O. (you knocked it out of the park) and Rich, N9JIG at scannermaster for his honest opinions and assistance in answering questions before purchase.
Dave N9DAV
I primarily purchased this for listening to my local public safety systems in the middle of an EXTREMELY challenging RF environment.
My BCD325P2 was missing 30-80% of the traffic on my local trunked systems due to simulcast/LSM in my immediate area. It was so bad, it was basically useless for my location. Years ago, my BC780's, 785's, 796's and BCD396 worked great, but that was before simulcast was a problem in my area.
While my Unication G5 works wonders for this issue, you can only monitor 1 trunked system at a time with it. Also, there is no channel/talkgroup delay and it's very limited in "banks", "channels" etc. so it makes a poor choice for someone that wants to monitor more than 1 trunked system and/or dozens of talkgroups simultaniously.
After using the the SDS100 for just 3 days, I can honestly say it is EXCELLENT at handling simulcast/LSM issues in challenging RF areas. I will add that in addition to 700-800Mhz trunked systems, there are numerous radio transmitters of many bands in my area (about 4 miles from the home of Motorola)
This is comparing it to my G5 on the same systems. The SDS100 might miss 1/2 second of the beginning of a transmission but the G5 is parked on the control channel so it has a slight advantage.
I will try to write a short review at some point (after I have more time with the radio). For now however, I wanted to let anyone that was thinking about purchasing an SDS100, it should be excellent in bad simulcast areas. It works so well, I am thinking about adding an SDS200 at some point.
A big shout out to Uniden and Paul O. (you knocked it out of the park) and Rich, N9JIG at scannermaster for his honest opinions and assistance in answering questions before purchase.
Dave N9DAV
Last edited: