Read http://harriscountyares.org/training/EME/EME-107.pdf. This is the FCC document pertaining to legality...
That is NOT an FCC document. It is an opinion piece by one Richard G. Johnson, "Esquire", AE3C, that quotes excerpts of Part 97 rules.
and ZZ0468 should take special note.
Why? Because the author of that article advocates a certain interpretation of a poorly written rule?
The purpose of the rule is not to give amateurs carte blanche to operate out of band in an emergency. It does not authorize programming up your radios out of band "just in case". The intent of the rule is two-fold... One, to allow a situation, such as a Technician Class operator calling for help on Extra class sub-bands, or otherwise communicating with a non-amateur station on amateur frequencies, which is normally prohibited. The other thing is, the rules are not intended to contribute to loss of life due to a pedantic adherence to said rules.
In other words, if saving a life REQUIRES out of band operation or communicating with a non-amateur station on amateur frequencies, just do it and ask questions later. But it is NOT a blanket authorization for out of band operation. That is specifically prohibited in the Rules and Regulations for other services, as well as within the Communications Act of 1934 as amended.
Part 97 rules are written for frequencies assigned to the Amateur Service. They have no bearing on any other frequencies unless specifically stated, as in the Alaska rule. No more, no less. A non-amateur is every bit as authorized to fire up on a police channel in an emergency as an amateur is... that is to say, NOT. That being said, if it's required to save a life, you do what you need to do, and hang the consequences. No one, including the FCC, wants to see anyone die because a radio wasn't used.
Last edited: