The title should have said, "Where is the New M/A-COM Regional Network to serve Colorado?" but Where’s Waldo came to mind.
http://www.macom-wireless.com/Channels/chnls_vol5_iss2.pdf
I know we have talked about this article before, however it bugs the hell out of me listening to the Fire the other night that Aurora and Denver were both working.
http://www.radioreference.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20657
When I read this article it cracks me up. I feel like I am reading a comic book.
Just a couple of things that made me smirk as I read them...
-System would provide at least 95% portable coverage,
-We wanted to be assured that we would have no interoperability
issues with adjacent jurisdictions.
-With so many EDACS users in the region, it
was only natural that they form a user group
to share information. “The Rocky Mountain
EDACS User Group was formed almost two
years ago, primarily to bring all the EDACS
users in the area together as one,"
-There are over 12 agencies involved, and
group meetings are held at a different agency
each month
So Aurora complains about coverage? Heck they only wanted 95% portable coverage. Seems to me they got want they wanted.
What frustrates me most is that the major metro agencies do not use each other’s systems in time of need. There needs to be a mutual aid group is created for each EDACS trunk in the area. How easy would it have been for Denver to switch their radios to the Aurora system and talk on Public Safety 1? The fire would have been knocked in no time with them working together. But why they worry about patches and the Stargate controller to link them just boggles my mind.
>Jim< nailed it on the head with this comment, “It's not a matter of the technology being available it's more so a matter of politics and what is the fire service motto something like "100 years of tradition impeded by progress"? It's not a matter of the radios systems abilities or lack of, there are many more deep seated problems than that.”
I would jump at the chance to attend on of the “monthly meetings,” and just grill the people there! I would say WTF is going on. Why does it take people losing their lives for something to change? Lets be the first to say we were PREACTIVE vs. PROACTIVE. We the people trust you to serve us and keep us safe, thus your job description, “PUBLIC SAFETY.”
Erik
http://www.macom-wireless.com/Channels/chnls_vol5_iss2.pdf
I know we have talked about this article before, however it bugs the hell out of me listening to the Fire the other night that Aurora and Denver were both working.
http://www.radioreference.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20657
When I read this article it cracks me up. I feel like I am reading a comic book.
Just a couple of things that made me smirk as I read them...
-System would provide at least 95% portable coverage,
-We wanted to be assured that we would have no interoperability
issues with adjacent jurisdictions.
-With so many EDACS users in the region, it
was only natural that they form a user group
to share information. “The Rocky Mountain
EDACS User Group was formed almost two
years ago, primarily to bring all the EDACS
users in the area together as one,"
-There are over 12 agencies involved, and
group meetings are held at a different agency
each month
So Aurora complains about coverage? Heck they only wanted 95% portable coverage. Seems to me they got want they wanted.
What frustrates me most is that the major metro agencies do not use each other’s systems in time of need. There needs to be a mutual aid group is created for each EDACS trunk in the area. How easy would it have been for Denver to switch their radios to the Aurora system and talk on Public Safety 1? The fire would have been knocked in no time with them working together. But why they worry about patches and the Stargate controller to link them just boggles my mind.
>Jim< nailed it on the head with this comment, “It's not a matter of the technology being available it's more so a matter of politics and what is the fire service motto something like "100 years of tradition impeded by progress"? It's not a matter of the radios systems abilities or lack of, there are many more deep seated problems than that.”
I would jump at the chance to attend on of the “monthly meetings,” and just grill the people there! I would say WTF is going on. Why does it take people losing their lives for something to change? Lets be the first to say we were PREACTIVE vs. PROACTIVE. We the people trust you to serve us and keep us safe, thus your job description, “PUBLIC SAFETY.”
Erik