• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Which would you use?

JamesBrox

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 31, 2018
Messages
261
Location
Santa Rosa County, FL
I'll try to make this as detailed and as short as I can. My current set-up in the shack is two external/outside antennas. One for the repeater and one for base.
The first antenna is an Ed Fong DBJ-UHF GMRS w/ 50' Messi & Paoloni (M&P) coax about 43' above elevation. It's my repeater antenna. The repeater is an all-in-one unit with the duplexer (Bridgecom BCR-40DU), it has two 40w radios inside.
Second antenna is a Comet CA-712 EFC w/ 25' of M&P coax about 20' above elevation....this is for a KG-1000G+(50w) base unit.
I understand that duplexers take at least half of the power away. Got it.....nothing I can do about that. I ran a test with a SureCom SW-102. Correct, this is not a "high-end" tester. I do this for a hobby. Here's what I got.

RPT-SWR-DL(Dummy Load) = 1.01 w/ 22.3watts
RPT-SWR-Coax(50')-Ed Fong= 2.8 w/ 17.7watts
RPT-SWR-Coax(25')-Comet 1.2 w/ 22watts

Base-SWR-DL 1.1 w/ 46.7watts
Base-SWR-Coax(50') Ed Fong 2.0 w/44.6watts
Base-SWR-Coax(25') Comet 1.6 w/ 44.5watts

I understand that I've opened myself up to a lot of criticism and that there's a lot of variables, but which one would you put the repeater on and which one for base?
 
Last edited:

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,306
Location
United States
Well, it really looks like the repeater is happier with the Comet antenna. I'd use that.

I'd also look at the duplexer internal to the Bridgecom repeater. They are not great, Chinese flat pack with no so wonderful specs, but you should be seeing a bit better than that. Having someone tune them for the exact repeater pair you are using would be a good idea, they claim 1.5dB of insertion loss. Ordering them tuned and having them shipped often results in them getting knocked around and detuning.
You can also adjust the power output from the front panel for that repeater. Might be worth checking the output directly at the jack on the TX radio deck before it goes into the duplexer.

I got stuck with a few of those repeaters at a remote site. I tuned the duplexers once they were installed on site. But I'm only running the at 10 watts per the license.
 

jeepsandradios

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
2,387
Location
East of the Mississippi
As I said in the other forum buy a real antenna. I dont understand the fascination with ham built junk on repeaters. The antenna system is the most important part of the repeater. Buy a quality LMR antenna and good feedline and the repeater will work much better.

Also as @mmckenna brought up I'd have your duplexer looked at. Normally bridgecomm tunes it in the middle of the GMRS band and ships it. Having it looked at should help.
 

KF0NYL

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2023
Messages
161
I agree that you should double check the duplexer to make sure it is tuned correctly. My club just bought a Bridgecom repeater but decided to go with our own duplexer. We had a spare duplexer for our 70cm repeaters that we tuned specifically for the GMRS repeater.

You should also be able to tune the Ed Fong to get a better SWR reading. You will need something better than a Surecom to tune the antenna though. Check to see what frequency the antenna is resonant at and adjust accordingly.
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,974
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
Duplex operation (transmitting into the same antenna while receiving) requires much more precision when it comes to tuning of the duplex filter itself, feedline, antenna and grounding. All play a factor in performance. A base radio can work just fine on a low rent antenna and cheap coax and produce acceptable results.

Expecting your two 40 watt radios in a box to play nice and not interact with each other using bargain basement components and guesswork tuning is just a time vampire that won't amaze you or anyone.

Proper duplex setup means on site tuning with a proper tracking generator after determining receiver itself is actually functioning to spec. Usually done using an ISO-T. Your antenna and feedline are part of the duplex filter system and WILL affect filter tuning. No way to do it other than right but what do we know.
 
Top