Rochester is differnt kind of beast as far as encyrption in minnesota goes, but as the billboard for Think Credit union up on broadway and 37th says, Rochester = Smart.
I think Encryption is initaited appropriately down here, but there are some definite issues. My biggest issue occurs when dispatch goes to ENC for an event and neglects to go back into the clear after the cessation of the event. Olmsted county seems to be one of the most prevalent users of encryption throught my travels of Minnesota, but maybe they have it figured out. Encryption is a very effective tool seeing as how the digital scanners are coming down in price and it provides officers some peace of mind when they step into a potentially violent situation, that they might indeed have the element of suprise.
When i worked in St. Cloud, one of my coworkers was a Meeker County deputy who almost fell prey to a system that operated in the clear in that a suspect who was violent and in a standoff sitation was known to have a scanner in his residence and knew full well of what radio traffic was occuring, so he went to the only form of encryption he had, a cell phone.
Olmsted County has plenty of active TG's that operate in the clear at all times like RST LEC 2, Fire TG's Gold Cross's MEDUPDATE and the IEMSR TG. Plus all of the Conventional Traffic and sometimes i have found RACOM's EDACS to be quite interesting.
So as a public servant myself in Roch, I fully support their use of encryption when it is warranted and i think that as other areas see the efficacy of encryption in gaining an upper hand, they will also follow suit. It is a real inconvenience to us who enjoy listening in to what they are doing, but i would rather be inconvenienced than attend a fellow public servants funeral.