• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Why is the Harris XL200 so popular ?

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,140
Location
Central Colorado, USA
All over my head now.. haven't had Motorola since the used Saber days. I don't understand affiliation and all that.
Example scenario: (this did not and will *not* happen to me): Crackhead swipes an APX or Harris. Agency knows it. Stuns radio. Crackhead sells it to someone. That someone turns it on, radio tries to register and won't so the illegitimate user bought a brick since the thing isn't allowed access to the system. Right?
It is possible to uninhibit a Harris radio but you need proper software to do it and doing so will remove the programming for the system that it was inhibited by, thus solving the problem for both the agency and the end user. (The radio may be programmed again, but at this point, it is no longer capable of registering on the system without reprogramming using the system key for that system.)

You should never buy a radio with the assumption that it is programmed to your specifications. You are buying the hardware. Period. Either program it yourself (using expensive software and proper cabling) or have a radio shop authorized to program radios for use on the desired system do it for you.

Inhibiting a radio does more than stop it from registering. It plays dead, not responding to user input and not displaying anything in the screen.

-B
 

Falcon9h

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
355
It is possible to uninhibit a Harris radio but you need proper software to do it and doing so will remove the programming for the system that it was inhibited by, thus solving the problem for both the agency and the end user. (The radio may be programmed again, but at this point, it is no longer capable of registering on the system without reprogramming using the system key for that system.)

You should never buy a radio with the assumption that it is programmed to your specifications. You are buying the hardware. Period. Either program it yourself (using expensive software and proper cabling) or have a radio shop authorized to program radios for use on the desired system do it for you.

Inhibiting a radio does more than stop it from registering. It plays dead, not responding to user input and not displaying anything in the screen.

-B
Oh, for the good old days when you could hack anything! 😢 Brave new world and I don't have a place in it... glad I'm old. 🙄
 

wa8pyr

Technischer Guru
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,254
Location
Ohio
The catalog is list price. No one should be paying list price.
25% or more off that is super easy to do. A good purchasing agency can knock that down even farther.

I paid around $6600 each, that was with LTE, BeON, encryption, P25 trunking (Phase 1 and 2) VHF, UHF, 700, 800MHz, 4.8Ah battery, speaker mic and a bunch of other add ons. Only thing I didn't order was the 900MHz option.
If Motorola can do cheaper, they should have stepped up.

I paid around $4500 each for our XL200P portables; only things we didn't get were BeON and Phase II. Motorola wanted nearly $7000 for something comparable.

I've always found Motorola to be more expensive (nearly double in most cases) than anybody else. Face it, you're paying for the privilege of having the name and batwings on your radio. If I can get one cheap for personal use, would I? Certainly. But if I could get an XL200P cheap for personal use I'd do that first.
 

ElroyJetson

Getting tired of all the stupidity.
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
3,895
Location
Somewhere between the Scylla and Charybdis
This is as good a place as any for me to note that Harris has really changed the game a lot since they bought out Tyco-M/A-Com.

Motorola is thrilled to land contracts in the tens of millions of dollars, but when you look at the Harris business, it wasn't long ago that the Harris government communications systems division got their half of a nearly seven BILLION dollar contract for military radios for the US armed services.

The days of Harris being the underdog and the competitor that has 10 percent of the market share in communications are OVER.

I view this as a good thing. Competition improves the breed. Harris has been playing a smart game, being a larger, very heavily funded company with immense resources, that wants a bigger piece of the radio market in general. And the public safety market in particular.

Motorola needs to reconsider its approach. Their competitor has become much more of a competitor. It's fair to say that they're generally equal in their ability to serve customer needs, or if not, the difference isn't much anymore. Even trivial. They need to get to the point where they can match a competitor's contract offer dollar for dollar or even submit a lower quote or provide more value for the same bottom line price.

Motorola REALLY missed their opportunity to retire the competition when Ericsson dropped out of the Commnet-Ericsson partnership, leaving Commnet holdling the bag alone. At that point the company was preparing to circle the drain but then got rescued by a very surprising move on the part of the State of Florida to hand the Statewide (SLERS) radio contract to Commnet. At the time it was the biggest radio contract in history, in the billion dollar plus range, and that not only saved Commnet's bacon, it made them an attractive proposition and was soon partnered up with M/A-Com.

What Motorola SHOULD have done is bought out Commnet as soon as Ericsson packed its bags and left. And I said so at the time.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,494
Location
United States
Motorola needs to reconsider its approach. Their competitor has become much more of a competitor. nd I said so at the time.

Sure, but I'm kind of happy they haven't. After dealing with Motorola, Motorola service contracts and the "Motorola Shop Du Jour" that we were required to use, and worse, Motorola Sales, I'm glad they are shrinking in their market. After 15 years of them making my life miserable, I'm really enjoying seeing the strong competition. My life got easier when we stopped being a "Motorola Only" agency.
So far, they haven't done anything that makes me want to switch back, and honestly, I don't think they ever will regain their standing.
 

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,140
Location
Central Colorado, USA
Moto did just buy Barrett. I’m trying to get a 4050 before they mess it up somehow. I don’t think it’s enough to move the needle, but maybe they want to get back into HF for whatever reason. I really think that Harris has the better platform at this point. BeOn is reportedly REALLY good tech and the new single u repeater base stations are looking amazing! I’m glad to see the market moving towards a density battle. It signals platform maturity; moving from just platform development to a focus on platform efficiency. Exciting times in LMR. And I’m glad Harris hasn’t been influenced (thus far) by the Next… I like my radios to be radios, not android devices with some radio hardware attached. Form factor is important for ergonomics and I’ve used plenty of “glove friendly” and “works when wet” touchscreens and they were all a disappointment to say the least. Then you have the amazing Harris military radios. Dual transmitter handhelds and manpacks providing a bridge between L-band satcoms, HF, and even trunking!!! It’s an amazing time to be working with radios… you just need to win the lottery to fund the Harris aspect of the hobby!

-B
 

rjschilder

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
169
Location
AES FTW
Moto did just buy Barrett. I’m trying to get a 4050 before they mess it up somehow. I don’t think it’s enough to move the needle, but maybe they want to get back into HF for whatever reason. I really think that Harris has the better platform at this point. BeOn is reportedly REALLY good tech and the new single u repeater base stations are looking amazing! I’m glad to see the market moving towards a density battle. It signals platform maturity; moving from just platform development to a focus on platform efficiency. Exciting times in LMR. And I’m glad Harris hasn’t been influenced (thus far) by the Next… I like my radios to be radios, not android devices with some radio hardware attached. Form factor is important for ergonomics and I’ve used plenty of “glove friendly” and “works when wet” touchscreens and they were all a disappointment to say the least. Then you have the amazing Harris military radios. Dual transmitter handhelds and manpacks providing a bridge between L-band satcoms, HF, and even trunking!!! It’s an amazing time to be working with radios… you just need to win the lottery to fund the Harris aspect of the hobby!

-B
100% agree. BeOn works great, and it's available for PC, IOS, Android, and all XL radios...very cool. And yea, the Two47 line is cool too. Where else can you get a 1U base station with a 10-100w HPA built in, not to mention it has a virtualization engine built in to virtualize trunking and data software/hardware. Very slick.
 

ElroyJetson

Getting tired of all the stupidity.
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
3,895
Location
Somewhere between the Scylla and Charybdis
I know it's wishful thinking but it'd be nice if BeOn could be available as a scanner app. You can install BeOn on your phone right now but it's useless without access and authorization data that you won't be getting as an outsider.
 

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,140
Location
Central Colorado, USA
I know it's wishful thinking but it'd be nice if BeOn could be available as a scanner app. You can install BeOn on your phone right now but it's useless without access and authorization data that you won't be getting as an outsider.
Ya… wishful thinking is putting is nicely! I know you know even better than I do that L3H doesn’t care about the hobbyist. Im lucky to get support through my dealer, but even that is backburnered relative to customers with multi-million dollar contracts!! I’m sure L3H sees that as a total OPSEC nightmare!

It would be nice, but I’d bet money on it not happening!

-B
 

rjschilder

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
169
Location
AES FTW
why would it be made as a scanner. It was designed to be a direct talk path into a VIDA core.
Right
Ya… wishful thinking is putting is nicely! I know you know even better than I do that L3H doesn’t care about the hobbyist. Im lucky to get support through my dealer, but even that is backburnered relative to customers with multi-million dollar contracts!! I’m sure L3H sees that as a total OPSEC nightmare!

It would be nice, but I’d bet money on it not happening!

-B
That and you need a full Vida core, beon server licensing in that core, and licenses per client. If you're not government you're not getting beon unfortunately.
 

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,140
Location
Central Colorado, USA
Right

That and you need a full Vida core, beon server licensing in that core, and licenses per client. If you're not government you're not getting beon unfortunately.
Ya I interpreted his idea as a BeOn RX only app where you could essentially NAS or unregistered scan a particular system… not that it would ever function as a traditional scanner. That said, it’s never ever EVER going to happen. You would essentially be adding a back door “feature”. It’s not a feature in the eyes of a sysadmin, it’s a security hole. Even if it was a “feature”, I can’t think of a sysadmin that would check that box, not to mention that the BeOn subscriber database would be littered with users that aren’t even tangentially related to the municipality and I can’t imagine a sysadmin wanting to fulfill a password reset request for ‘loves2splooge@hotmail.com’ for the eleventh time…

-B
 

rjschilder

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
169
Location
AES FTW
Ya I interpreted his idea as a BeOn RX only app where you could essentially NAS or unregistered scan a particular system… not that it would ever function as a traditional scanner. That said, it’s never ever EVER going to happen. You would essentially be adding a back door “feature”. It’s not a feature in the eyes of a sysadmin, it’s a security hole. Even if it was a “feature”, I can’t think of a sysadmin that would check that box, not to mention that the BeOn subscriber database would be littered with users that aren’t even tangentially related to the municipality and I can’t imagine a sysadmin wanting to fulfill a password reset request for ‘loves2splooge@hotmail.com’ for the eleventh time…

-B
LOL!!! Spot on dude, spot on :) Another thing is there is no way to disable ptt on Beon. It's all or nothing.
 

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,675
Location
Hubert, NC
We finally got our BeOn system working and it is awesome. I only wish the volume on Android devices could be made louder. I have tried every setting imaginable and it just sounds like ear piece volume.

Also, just to clear up the inhibit thing, an inhibited radio will still register to the system. I see them all day long. Even though the screen is blank, the radio is still logged on. Otherwise, I would not be able to turn it back on once the owning agency "finds" the radio.
 

rjschilder

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
169
Location
AES FTW
We finally got our BeOn system working and it is awesome. I only wish the volume on Android devices could be made louder. I have tried every setting imaginable and it just sounds like ear piece volume.

Also, just to clear up the inhibit thing, an inhibited radio will still register to the system. I see them all day long. Even though the screen is blank, the radio is still logged on. Otherwise, I would not be able to turn it back on once the owning agency "finds" the radio.
Good to hear :) we got the best performance from the sonim xp8. Speaker volume was as loud as regular portables. And you're right...ever since a few versions ago of beon, the android volume does seem to be extremely quiet compared to what it used to be.
 
Top