We've had a San Bernardino, an Orlando, a Dallas event and others (maybe not in Alaska, yet...), but, when is it OK to prepare? After some other unsuspecting city is caught off-guard and ill-prepared for the next round of lunatics with big weaponry terrorizing our cities? Local law enforcement beefing up their appearance and scaring the Hillary crowd? Who cares. The civilian world is better equipped because your current leader and likely the next don't even believe there is global terrorism. Some of the local leaders do, however, get it!
I read your post and I agree with some of it but I'm not sure what your "angle" is.
I tell you this, I agree with Law Enforcement and Public Safety in general being properly trained and equipped to meet the evolving challenges that they're presented with. I even agree with having a SWAT team and more powerful weapons and protection for those special occasions and incidents.
BUT THAT is where I draw the line and I have the problem with. When is used excessively and unnecessarily almost on a daily basis. For a while, there even used to be one of many Troopers unmarked cars doing traffic stops with an officer fully dressed in military fatigues and even the field boots. What would go through your head when you see such officer approaching you? Then they have an MRAP or equivalent armored vehicle that's being used ALL the time, even for calls of a single person with a knife barricaded alone in their house or their car. Really? What did they EVER do in the past without all that?
I could go on about all the reasons why is concerning and even going down a dangerous path to have an increasingly militaristic looking and intimidating civilian police force. There's a reason why is even in the Constitution that our military CANNOT be deployed in our own soil and against our citizens. So are they "circumventing" that by creating a civilian military force as ridiculous as even the term sounds?
BUT not today and not when I have a feeling some will come to the government's rescue and over-simplify the whole issue to something like "well, they do what they think they have to do to keep us and themselves safe", right? All that comes to mind is the infamous, highly butchered quote of "Those that give up their freedom for temporary safety...."