Alternative to Stridsberg

Marcy57

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 7, 2021
Messages
1,196
Reaction score
1,030
I've been trying a pair of these and have been happy with them so far:

E-PHEMT PreAmplifier

Note that it did take around a month for them to arrive since they're made to order, but I have yet to find anything else close to these specs for a reasonable price.
Very nice, how is it powered up ? I might get one ...what do they mean "Tuned Freq/?" like you enter a freq. in that range that you want it tuned to? I would be interested in the 150-174 one...N connectors...73,s Marcy
 

nickwilson159

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
111
Reaction score
127
Location
Hudson Valley
Very nice, how is it powered up ? I might get one ...what do they mean "Tuned Freq/?" like you enter a freq. in that range that you want it tuned to? I would be interested in the 150-174 one...N connectors...73,s Marcy
12 VDC power. And they factory tune it to your target frequency range - I had them tune mine for railroad frequencies (160 - 161 MHz).
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,145
Reaction score
13,931
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I've been trying a pair of these and have been happy with them so far:

E-PHEMT PreAmplifier

Note that it did take around a month for them to arrive since they're made to order, but I have yet to find anything else close to these specs for a reasonable price.
With an IP3 of 40dBm the 1dB compression is probably in the 25dBm range and not bad. It would probably make a good preamp for a repeater as its narrow band at 3-4MHz wide at VHF and would be a little wider at UHF. But for general purpose scanner type use it needs to cover at least a complete band like 136-174 or 108-174 and you could run separate antennas for each band with its own preamp then combine with a triplexer, etc.
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
10,808
Reaction score
4,584
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
It probably uses a $3 PGA103+ pHEMT amplifier as the specs seems identical.

High IP3, +45 dBm Typ. at 2 GHz
Low Noise Figure, 0.6 at 1 GHz; 0.9 dB at 2 GHz
Gain, 11.0 dB Typ. at 2 GHz
P1dB +22.5 dBm Typ. at 2 GHz
May Be Used as a Replacement for RFMD SPF-5189ZA,B

/Ubbe
 

ShawnInPaso

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
491
Reaction score
83
I couldn't get ahold of anyone at Stridsberg so I decided to make my own HF passive splitter using resistors, chassis mounted SO-239's and an aluminum chassis. Yes, there is a loss, but as I'm not dealing with VHF/UHF sigs the loss will not be noticable. Total cost is a little over 40 bucks for 5 ports.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,145
Reaction score
13,931
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I couldn't get ahold of anyone at Stridsberg so I decided to make my own HF passive splitter using resistors, chassis mounted SO-239's and an aluminum chassis. Yes, there is a loss, but as I'm not dealing with VHF/UHF sigs the loss will not be noticable. Total cost is a little over 40 bucks for 5 ports.
A well designed resistive 2-way splitter has about 6dB loss and a home made 5-way is probably 10dB or more loss per port. Why not get a used commercial splitter off fleabay cheap? A non resistive low loss 5-way splitter is going to have at least 7dB loss and there is no way around that.
 

buddrousa

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
14,315
Reaction score
10,280
Location
Retired 40 Year Firefighter NW Tenn
For some reason not known to the public they have been slow filling orders and responding to calls and it has been that way for months per the reports in this forum.
 

kennedy-r

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Location
Massapequa Fire District
For some reason not known to the public they have been slow filling orders and responding to calls and it has been that way for months per the reports in this forum.
Slow is ok just made a huge order and want to make sure it processes at some point and the voicemail is full
 

Firebuff66

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Messages
700
Reaction score
787
Location
CT
I use 4 of these and they work great
s-l1600-jpg.155299
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,145
Reaction score
13,931
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I use 4 of these and they work great
s-l1600-jpg.155299
That item is designed for a closed CATV system with a maximum of 77 carriers at specific input levels and not for an antenna system with hundreds or more carriers at varying levels. It might work in some areas with little RF traffic but it wont work everywhere and certainly not in my neighborhood.
 

Firebuff66

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Messages
700
Reaction score
787
Location
CT
That item is designed for a closed CATV system with a maximum of 77 carriers at specific input levels and not for an antenna system with hundreds or more carriers at varying levels. It might work in some areas with little RF traffic but it wont work everywhere and certainly not in my neighborhood.
I have 20 scanners and 12 Mobile radios using 4 of those connected to 5 antennas on a pole out side with lmr400 to each, and they listening to 1000s of channels and mutable trunk systems with no issues
I have used these to set up an 8 scanner 1 antenna system in Cambridge ma with no issues.
So for the $20 each i paid on ebay i think they are working out great
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,145
Reaction score
13,931
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I have 20 scanners and 12 Mobile radios using 4 of those connected to 5 antennas on a pole out side with lmr400 to each, and they listening to 1000s of channels and mutable trunk systems with no issues
I have used these to set up an 8 scanner 1 antenna system in Cambridge ma with no issues.
So for the $20 each i paid on ebay i think they are working out great
You are one of the lucky listeners that are not in a high level RF environment. For many people those amplifiers will be a complete failure like they are at my location. They can actually make reception worse with a raised noise floor and ghost signals across the bands created inside the amplifier as Intermodulation distortion due to pushing the poor little amplifier chip inside way beyond what its designed for.
 

brian86

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
173
Reaction score
38
Location
Maryland
3 weeks ago I ordered the 700/800mhz Pre-Amp (PRE-78) and the 700/800mhz (MCA780M) and hadn't received a shipping confirmation after about a week. I called and talked to someone there who had said they were re-designing the 700/800mhz products and that they were not available. I ended up changing my order to the PRE-20 and MCA204M with the gentleman and the items arrived a couple days later.
 
Top