Bad publicity and the inability to control the message.Interesting, I don't see criminals running around with SDS-100s, I wonder what they are worried about.
Bad publicity and the inability to control the message.Interesting, I don't see criminals running around with SDS-100s, I wonder what they are worried about.
Bad publicity and the inability to control the message.
Yea, you don't hear names used over PS radio: bad comsec. That's what MDTs and alphanumeric devices / smartphones are for.Oh, the sun must have spelled that wrong, it came out as "protect potential victims and witnesses, while also enhancing officer safety"
I'm being sarcastic because the subject annoys me.
Send it in again, with the nice rejection letter attached.When the new chief was hired, because he came from New Orleans, LA PD and while there he encrypted New Orleans PD, I wrote an op-ed piece to the Baltimore Sun against encrypting Baltimore PD. They sent me a nice response back that my information wasn't worth printing because it wasn't an issue in Baltimore. Enough said!
Wait, where are they getting all this money from? That's at least $500 PER RADIO. They're shutting down firehouses but spending potentially a million dollars on secrecy??? Way to go, Baltimore 😂
It just hit the Baltimore Sun.
Baltimore Police moving to encrypt scanner transmissions, keeping public from hearing calls
Philly's system cost roughly the same $52M back in the day.Damn, they even got robbed back then lmao
From the control channel on newer scanners. No need to change programming generally.If a new traffic channel is added to a trunked system do appropriate favorites lists site information need to be updated or does the scanner get the new frequency from the control channel as needed?