SOSBaseStation
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2011
- Messages
- 13
I monitored Reading FD on the new system this weekend while passing through on the PA turnpike, so they're active on the new system now, too.
How does one monitor the PD freq?
I monitored Reading FD on the new system this weekend while passing through on the PA turnpike, so they're active on the new system now, too.
How does one monitor the PD freq?
Someone can tell me I'm wrong, but you cannot. They are fully encrypted.
You are correct. All PD are encrypted as referenced in the database. Last night it sounded like some of the EMS to Hospital were also encrypted. But, since I am so far away, it might have just been that garbled.
You heard correctly, almost everything is encrypted except for fire call outs. I didn't think it was supposed to be everything, but as it turned out, at least to this point, 90% of everything is encrypted which is very dissapointing.
Mike
Hi Brian,
Well the first week the system went live it seemed to me that everything but the fire call outs were encrypted, but as of late I do hear the fire and EMS (Except BLS to hospitals) are indeed not encrypted. Maybe it was just that most of the comms were occurring on encrypted channels the first few days. Thank you Brian for the reply.
Take Care,
Mike
All interoperability talkgroups will be in the clear also, so the traffic that is patched to those groups as needed will also be in the clear, even when the traffic is law enforcement.
.
Is this still the case? What type of issues would require use of the interoperability talkgroups?
Thanks!
Yes.
Out of county mutual aid by agencies that are not part of our subscriber fleet.
With Reading PD and FD on the new system, is there any traffic left on the legacy Motorola 800 system?
Previously I had provided someone the data on the new system with TG IDs, names, uses and such. I think his page name was Chauffer or something like that. I am not sure if that ever made it into your resources.