gregsto
Member
I believe this is a trial for the next few months -- if dispatch believes the details of the incident might eventually warrant a flyout, they can get the crews moving early to shorten the time to get the aircraft to the scene.
This is probably an adjustment to the current plan that has been in place for the last few years following the helo crash in PG County. Nowadays, they don't fly quite as much and when the helo is requested, it's taking a long time to get the crew activated and the helo to the scene.
This is a good step in the right direction.
One would think that a middle of the road procedure of placing the medevac on "standby" which can mean either the crew is to physically go sit in the helicopter preparing for power up and takeoff (which sometimes also involves moving the ship out of a hanger prior to launch), or the crew in fact powers up the helicopter awaiting the go ahead to launch (and said launch would then be in seconds). Obviously the second option involves fuel expenditure and adding some time on the engines and aircraft ($$), but both options are used in many jurisdictions around the country and BOTH versions can be part of the protocol, choosing between them based on estimated flight time when launched and severity of initial info into dispatch.
Also it is clear that various MD jurisdictions have adopted their own approaches regarding at what point during an incident they call for a medevac. Washington county for example seems to have some of the most frequent launches and then cancellations while in the air of trooper 3. Of course it is understandable due to their remote distance from a Level 1 Trauma Center.