CT State System Setup

Status
Not open for further replies.

MarkEagleUSA

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Messages
677
Location
Connecticut
EricCottrell said:
The CT and MA state systems both use Smartzones with Simulcast.

"Site" 1 for South Fairfield County uses these locations:
GREENWICH, REDDING, SHELTON, WEST HAVEN, and WILTON

"Site" 6 for Windham County uses these locations:
BROOKLYN, FRANKLIN, NORTH GROSVENORDALE, STERLING, STORRS, and UNION

So if a unit affiliates with Site 1 then it's talkgroup is simulcast from the locations for site 1. If another unit on the talkgroup affiliates with Site 6 then the network will send talkgroup audio to the locations for Site 6 as well.
Thanks!!! Seeing that breakdown makes a lot of sense to me now (and I don't know why it didn't occur to me sooner). I just did a quick check of the data I have on the other Site locations and don't see an wide dispersement of frequencies like those for Site 1 and 6, except for Site 9 South Caanan (northwest corner) which shows a location in West Haven (south central).


Being able to share Talkgroups between systems would be a handy feature if it can be done with a simple UI. There are some issues that need to be resolved like if the user deletes a TGID is it erased from all systems?
What I was thinking would be a way to select an existing Group to use with the System being programmed. That would mean the ability to enter/edit Group settings independently of any System. The UI would need to have a Program Group option in addition to Program System. Any changes made to the Group would be reflected in all Systems that use it.
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Location
Katy, TX
MarkEagleUSA said:
I wouldn't call it wasted, but it certainly doesn't belong here. Can all but the first post be split off into a new topic and moved into the Connecticut forum? I'd really like to get a better understanding of how the CSP system really works so that I can adjust my setup accordingly if need be.
Hopefully I split the original topic correctly. And it seems, from other postes that in fact the RR DB needs some adjustments in its descriptions. :cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top