What was the TGID for channel 3? I don’t see one listed in the DB
From post #103 in this thread. Sounds like there is a possibly new patch from a Dallas Fire Rescue UHF channel to talk group 3 on existing Dallas 700 Mhz P25/COG site.What was the TGID for channel 3? I don’t see one listed in the DB
From post #103 in this thread. Sounds like there is a possibly new patch from a Dallas Fire Rescue UHF channel to talk group 3 on existing Dallas 700 Mhz P25/COG site.
Oops. You're right. I don't think I've heard DFR channel 3 patched to anything yet. The non-P25/analog trunked system did have some patches, so they may have been there. They also used that system last weekend for the drill at Love Field. Dallas Local Government analog Motorola trunked system.I thought TGID 3 was just a patch for DFR 1? Did they patch DFR 3 to the same TGID or a different one?
I thought TGID 3 was just a patch for DFR 1? Did they patch DFR 3 to the same TGID or a different one?
Those had already been added to the database:This morning Dallas Layer 2 TG: 33501,33502 35050,35051
Still not a whole lot going on, besides testing, and I believe city security.I'm going to be returning to Collin County over the holidays, and I'm planning to stick my MicroP25RXII on it to see what I can get. I'm on the fringe of the system in Mckinney, but I'm sure to find something interesting.
Still not a whole lot going on, besides testing, and I believe city security.
I believe they probably already have access to the NTIRN IO channels, and I know that GMRS has some IO channels on the Dallas Site(s) as well.Is Collin County going to have MA talk groups on the system I wonder?
I don't think they will do much more until the Holidays are over. When I try to think back to when Fort Worth moved to their P25 system, I think it was around the first of February.Still not a whole lot going on, besides testing, and I believe city security.
Is Collin County going to have MA talk groups on the system I wonder?
Agreed - TG 32651 is now pretty active with routine security-related traffic...Still not a whole lot going on, besides testing, and I believe city security.
To scanner users it appears as two simulcast sites. I don't know where the name 'layer' came from. As far as the db and your scanner is concerned layer=site.Can someone explain the Layers please? i.,e. Fort Worth has lay 1 and 2. I am not familiar with the concept. Thanks