EBRCS Update

[officer_415]

@mlangeveld TG7955 (Vallejo PD), TG 7556 (San Ramon PD) and TG 10005 (EB Regional Parks) are noted as TDMA on my side today...

Thanks. I updated EBRP PD, the other two were already updated.

 

[KG7PBS]

No on encryption. That should take place county wide in a year or two according to documents provided to this discussion forum. Also, add Hayward to phase 2 this morning. Newark still phase 1 as of a few minutes ago.

Hi sorry to ask this can you tell me what page is the Encrypted talk about EBRCS on? I don’t remember thanks

 

[mcjones2013]

Hi sorry to ask this can you tell me what page is the Encrypted talk about EBRCS on? I don’t remember thanks

Here's a direct link to the post I made with the EBRCSA agenda item on AES encryption:

EBRCS Update

More activity this morning.... Thanks, doesn't look like it's including the San Jose State chatter. I am not quite close enough to receive this site properly so I wasn't able to do a good test on my end.

forums.radioreference.com

 

[kg6nlw]

Thanks. I updated EBRP PD, the other two were already updated.

Thanks. I hadn't seen the updates in the DB yet...

Regards,

-Frank C.

 

[Outerdog]

I think that 6053 CONFD E talkgroup designated as TDMA is a little premature.

If I submitted that, I think it was a mistake.

 

[officer_415]

I think that 6053 CONFD E talkgroup designated as TDMA is a little premature.

If I submitted that, I think it was a mistake.

You did. I'll change it back.

 

[kg6nlw]

I've noted that Walnut Creek PD, San Ramon PD and ALCO FD Dispatch 2 are all TDMA now. Looks like the two PD's are updated in the database already.

Regards,

-Frank C.

 

[Outerdog]

I have also logged TDMA on:

10007 EBRP FD1
6456 Benicia FD2
6305 Richmond FD1
6505 Vallejo Fire 1

 

[kg6nlw]

I think they're hit and miss on Benicia and Vallejo as all I'm seeing on them is FDMA.

Regards,

-Frank C.

 

[silagi]

Currently getting ALCO FD Dispatch 2 as Phase 1

 

[kg6nlw]

This TG popped up for me today as well. Such a shame it's enc...

2021/12/07 17:20:01 Freq=772.881250 NAC=1F5 Enc Group call; TG=7174 [ (TDMA)]
2021/12/07 17:20:04 Freq=774.456250 NAC=1F5 Enc Group call; TG=7174 [ (TDMA)] Ch=773.15625-1 Pri0
2021/12/07 17:20:05 Freq=773.156250 NAC=1F5 Enc Group call; TG=7174 [ (TDMA)]

Regards,

-Frank C.

 

[kg6nlw]

Currently getting ALCO FD Dispatch 2 as Phase 1

Must be hit and miss...I had it a few times as Phase 2. It seemed to switch between Phase 1 and 2 sometime after 1430H.

2021/12/07 14:19:38 Freq=774.456250 NAC=1F5 Group call; TG=2606 [ACFD DSP2] Ch=773.15625 Pri0
2021/12/07 17:23:19 Freq=772.356250 NAC=1F5 Group call; TG=2606 [ACFD DSP2 (TDMA)] Ch=772.05625 Pri0
2021/12/07 17:23:27 Freq=774.456250 NAC=1F5 Group call; TG=2606 [ACFD DSP2 (TDMA)] Ch=771.75625 Pri0
2021/12/07 17:23:37 Freq=774.456250 NAC=1F5 Group call; TG=2606 [ACFD DSP2 (TDMA)] Ch=771.75625 Pri0

Regards,

-Frank C.

 

[officer_415]

DB updated. All it takes is one Phase 1 radio affiliated for the TG to revert back to Phase 1. But for DB purposes, if the talkgroup is sometimes TDMA it should be marked T.

 

[silagi]

Tonight I am picking up ALCO FD Dispatch 3 as TDMA.

 

[N6ML]

From about 24 hours of monitoring CCCO Central, SDRtrunk captured phase 2 channel grants for the below list. I would have guessed that the entire site is phase 2 enabled, and it just comes down to the subscriber units....

Side-note; TGID 7171 appears to be another Concord PD channel - subscribers 4143444 and 4143701.

      5 "ACFD Dispatch 1 (P:2605 [2606])"
     31 "ACFD Dispatch 2 (P:2606 [2661])"
     39 "ACFD Dispatch 2 (P:2606 [2662])"
   1304 "ACFD Dispatch 2 (P:2606)"
    128 "ACFD Dispatch 3 (P:2607 [5530])"
     26 "ACFD Dispatch 3 (P:2607)"
     52 "ACFD Tac 3 (P:2661)"
     26 "ACFD Tac 5 (P:2663 [2606])"
    377 "ACMED1 (P:5530 [2607])"
    112 "ACMED1 (P:5530)"
    572 "AMR 5557 (P:5557 [5555])"
    277 "AMR CON-EMS (P:5555 [5556])"
   1762 "AMR CON-EMS (P:5555 [5557])"
    882 "AMR CON-EMS (P:5555)"
   2714 "AMR East (P:5556 [5555])"
     78 "AMR East (P:5556 [5557])"
   2065 "Benicia FD1 (P:6455)"
      8 "CCSO West (P:7726)"
    100 "CONFD B1 Cen (P:6052 [6008])"
      5 "CONFD B1 Cen (P:6052 [6053
      4 "CONFD B1 Cen (P:6052 [6054])"
     11 "CONFD B1 Cen (P:6052)"
     11 "CONFD C1 Est (P:6053 [6052])"
      6 "CONFD C1 Est (P:6053)"
     59 "CONFD E1 Wst (P:6054 [6052
     60 "CONFD E1 Wst (P:6054 [6052])"
      6 "CONFD E1 Wst (P:6054 [6053])"
     15 "CONFD E1 Wst (P:6054)"
     19 "CatchAll (7171)"
  26822 "Concord PD1 (7155)"
   7797 "Concord PD2 (7169)"
    196 "Concord PD3 (7170)"
   4818 "EBRP FD1 (10007)"
  23903 "EBRP PD1 (10005)"
     48 "EBRP PD1 (P:10005)"
     79 "LAVTA1 (5002)"
  10401 "Martinez PD1 (7305)"
   8824 "Oakland PD3 (P:3407 [3405])"
    137 "Oakland PD6 (P:3410 [3411])"
    188 "Oakland PD6 (P:3410)"
    111 "Oakland PD7 (P:3411 [3410])"
   8509 "Richmond FD1 (6305)"
   1209 "Richmond PD2 (7506)"
  38333 "San Ramon PD1 (7556)"
  24481 "Vallejo PD1 (7955)"
  12747 "Vallejo FD1 (6505)"
  34888 "Walnut Creek PD1 (7605)"
    122 "Walnut Creek PD2 (7606)"

 

[officer_415]

From about 24 hours of monitoring CCCO Central, SDRtrunk captured phase 2 channel grants for the below list. I would have guessed that the entire site is phase 2 enabled, and it just comes down to the subscriber units....

Side-note; TGID 7171 appears to be another Concord PD channel - subscribers 4143444 and 4143701.

Thanks, DB updated.

 

[Radiobern]

I can confirm Alameda PD 1/3005 on ALCO NW is TDMA/Phase 2.

At this point, TDMA/Phase 2 availability is dependent on subscriber radios. If any radio affiliated on a talk group is still FDMA/Phase 1, it will stay FDMA/Phase 1.

 

[bharvey2]

I've continued to hear Alco FD dispatch on Phase 1 as late as yesterday. I've got an old SDR setup that currently receives Phase 1 only. I've noted less PD traffic but much of the maintenance type traffic (e.g. public works) is still there. Looks like I'll have to upgrade my software on this particular computer. The times they are a changin'.

 

[Eng74]

Most PD traffic has been encrypted by order of the state doj.

 

[kg6nlw]

Most PD traffic has been encrypted by order of the state doj.

The only stuff that is PII. Not a blanket encryption statement like you have said.

Regards,

-Frank C.