slicerwizard
Member
Well, I see his question about conversion utilities was answered by a helpful group member after only 30 minutes. Doesn't look dead to me.*shrug* Maybe the "Slicer Wizard" can answer that.
Quiet? Certainly. Dead? Hardly.
Well, I see his question about conversion utilities was answered by a helpful group member after only 30 minutes. Doesn't look dead to me.*shrug* Maybe the "Slicer Wizard" can answer that.
Thanks Andrew. I'm not a member so I can't see what's going on over there. Someone who actively uses T88 should write up a review in the Wiki. Would be a nice thing to have (apologies to Eric for distracting this thread).slicerwizard said:Doesn't look dead to me. Quiet? Certainly. Dead? Hardly.
You got it.EricCottrell said:I have a nearby SitePro EDACS system being built-out and tested. SitePro decoding and ESK will be included at a future time. If I can get a recording of a site when ESK is being sent it will help.
EricCottrell said:The lousy low frequency response of laptop sound inputs had me scratching my head for a bit. If a long series of ones or zeros occurs the signal tends to go to zero amplitude. So I need to do some more coding to fix it.
rfmobile said:
You now have a 5 meg WAV file in your inbox.
-rick
Don't confuse the guy. 0xA0 will work.blantonl said:XOR the EDACS command word (1st 8 bits) in msg 1a with "0A".
If you're running Windows XP - it will work (a feature of the OS). For Windows 9X and 2K, it probably won't work.Also, does this new etrunker app support multiple sound cards? For instance, Can i run two separate versions of etrunker simultanously?
rfmobile said:Don't confuse the guy. 0xA0 will work.
-rick
EricCottrell said:Multi-Net uses xor as well and I was able to figure out a way of determining it. I need to look at the bits to see how it is applied for ESK and if there is a pattern to test for.
I used a slightly different technique. In any case, be prepared for some funky decode results for that brief time period where the ESK mask is wrong. I'm note sure why Lindsay keeps referring to a value of "0A". If you treat the 28 bit EDACS code word as a 32 bit value and apply the XOR to the upper 8 bits then yes, that will work. It you're XOR'ing the upper 8 bits of the 28 bit code, then you'll want to use 0xA0. It's six for one, half-a-dozen for the other.blantonl said:Take the idle command word that you see often in the EDACS data stream, XOR it with "0A" and use that as a pattern to test for. If you don't see the regular EDACS idle command word for 2 secs, XOR the stream, and look for the XOR'd idle command. Rinse and repeat as necessary.
Hello,DaveNF2G said:WTrunker and EWTrunker both fail on my XP Pro machine.
Using the Run command, the screen flashes black, then returns to the desktop.
Using the Command Prompt, I get an error message saying, "Failed to set video modes."
I am also not happy with the weak signal performance of the decoder. This may be due to using passive devices for matching to my radios. I sometimes deal with weak signals when DXing so weak signal performance is an area of interest.
EricCottrell said:Hello,
The error message indicates it could not set the window to display 43 rows. Try setting the command prompt window to be 80 x 43. Right click on Command Prompt in the Toolbar and select properties. On the Layout tab, select 80 for width and 43 for height. Microsoft documentation indicates the setting of the screen size will fail if a window of the requested size can not be created due to factors like the font size being too big.
Hello,pboy said:Eric,
What does "using passive devices for matching to my radios" mean in relation to soundcard decoding?
Thanks.
EricCottrell said:Hello,
Using resistors and capacitors. Components that do not require power.
73 Eric