GRE PSR-900 Pre-Release Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

c5corvette

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
744
Reaction score
8
Location
*REBANDED*
I'm hopeful we get something eventually. I have none around here but where I travel they are slowly popping up. It would be nice to have something that works on them at some point. But as you said I'm thinking the 900 will not be it. Hopefully somewhere there's enough of a demand that it's being worked on to be released on a future unit.

Where do you travel that so many P25 Phase II are slowly popping up?

Has anyone actually tested PSR800/900 to confirm it will not pick up Phase II?
 

kinfolk

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Location
Springfield, Ohio
Where do you travel that so many P25 Phase II are slowly popping up?

Has anyone actually tested PSR800/900 to confirm it will not pick up Phase II?


I spoke to GRE several weeks ago and they confirmed that the PSR800/900 cannot decode P25 Phase II. I then asked if a firmware update could make these receivers compatible with P25 Phase II and the rep said no. He said a new model would have to be developed to decode Phase II.
 

Spitfire8520

Might be slightly less clueless! =)
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
2,034
Reaction score
193
Location
Colorado
I spoke to GRE several weeks ago and they confirmed that the PSR800/900 cannot decode P25 Phase II. I then asked if a firmware update could make these receivers compatible with P25 Phase II and the rep said no. He said a new model would have to be developed to decode Phase II.

Assuming that this information is accurate and the "rep" knows what he is talking about, looks like everyone who purchased the PSR-800 in hopes that it could receive Phase II will have a nice paperweight when Phase II implementation comes around.
 

One13Truck

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Messages
1,114
Reaction score
238
Location
My home 20 eating pizza.
Where do you travel that so many P25 Phase II are slowly popping up?

From what I've heard there's some in Md and Pa that are at least starting to migrate or strongly considering/waiting to do so. That's not saying any actually WILL and that the ones that are working on it have very much done. But it looks like some are determined to while others aren't very far along and may not go for it. And I won't rule out that the people I've heard things from have no idea what they're talking about as well...

The Northern part of Pa is still all conventional but those other areas I travel through a few times a year so if any of them actually do go to Phase II full time it would be a bummer. But then again by the time some of them get to a purchasing stage there may be something else out there besides Phase II that's pushed as the "latest and greatest".
 

trido

Retired 32 years scanner sales
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
327
Location
Southern In
Yes we tested a 800 on a phase II system in Bowling Green,Ky.I had a good long time customer of the store test it and it was not decoding that tyoe system.
 

RadioDitch

Field Operations Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
3,383
Reaction score
1,092
Location
Not Where You Think
Where do you travel that so many P25 Phase II are slowly popping up?

Here in New Jersey it is actually a requirement of funding that all the new 700MHz TRS's be P25 Phase II. And they are complying. Based on licenses and buildout info, by 2014 we'll have at least 7 counties, plus the state operating as such.
 

Boatanchor

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2011
Messages
991
Reaction score
5
Not really a good time to be releasing a new 'same ol' scanner is it?

If GRE release the 900 without phase 2/DMR capability, together with US consumers increasingly pulling back on discretionary spending, plus the negative comments posted here, it doesn't bode well for sales.

The fact is that unless the 900 has significant new capability, experienced punters will just stick with their existing scanners and newbies will buy the cheaper existing models that have well developed support bases available.

Don't be surprised if the actual release date of the PSR900 is postponed indefinately..
 

rgore

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
What is the benefit of a head at all, it it doesn't have a keypad?

Crazy huh.. Just like them people who buy them cellular telephones without keypads!

Would be nice to mount a head unit in my vehicle so it doesn't go flying around the cab. Since you don't need a keypad to operate a radio, it should work great.
 

RadioDaze

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
2,034
Reaction score
8
Location
Orange County, California, USA
One thing that is fair to note is that detachable-head ham radios typically have their keypad on the microphone. And the heads are usually smaller than DIN size.

I think a separate, and maybe optionally purchased, keypad would be a reasonable compromise. Though it's probably too late to engineer it into the 900, maybe the next "600" could go that route.

Even though some of our comments seem critical from time to time, I believe threads like these are useful to GRE (and Uniden) as a source of ideas for what their products should offer. We ARE the target market, right?
 
Last edited:

Radioman1993

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Yes we tested a 800 on a phase II system in Bowling Green,Ky.I had a good long time customer of the store test it and it was not decoding that tyoe system.

Well this information just stopped me from upgrading my current 500/600 pairing to anything else.

Guess I'll be in the dark for a while until someone comes out with a P25 PII capable scanner. If anyone wants help testing one I am available and work very closely with a soon to be P25 PII system.

Radioman
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2006
Messages
465
Reaction score
2
Location
Carteret County NC
GRE had a booth at Shelby (NC) Hamfest this past weekend and had a working PSR-900 on display and I was able to play with it.....it's just a mobile version of the PSR-800....no big improvement :-(

in fact they used the exact same PSR-800 spec/info sheet for the PSR-900.....

PSR-900 price was $100 higher than the PSR-600....
 
Last edited:

One13Truck

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Messages
1,114
Reaction score
238
Location
My home 20 eating pizza.
If it's just a base/mobile of the 800 that's still not too bad of a price. I'd like to see P25 PII or other new things along with it but depending on other factors just that alone wouldn't keep me from purchasing a 900. It'd be very disappointing but not a dealbreaker.
 

cherubim

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2011
Messages
506
Reaction score
102
Location
Sydney, Australia
It still looks like a good buy imo. The large memory capacity, loud speaker (presumably), clear display and detachable head are all great improvements. I don't really care for the iPod style of the PSR-800 even though the lack of a full keyboard is not an issue for me. The PSR-900 looks more to my liking as durability is something I consider important.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top