My problem is with the respond in kind part, I do remember in the early 90's when attacks on satellites were being thought about, and the common political thought was that no one will want to go to war over some satellites being knocked out... no U.S. territory being struck so it would be a hard sell for the public.Not really. It's just information. People can do what they want with it.
I remember in the 1970s a terror attack that was the magnitude of 9/11 was considered laughable by a lot of folks. I remember books that came out, fiction books that had similar level terror attacks and those books were considered to be so way out there that no one would consider the possibility of the financial center of the US's largest city being hollowed out.
It was considered to be in the realm of conspiracy/wacko/paranoia territory. But 9/11 happened.
I'm not saying EMP is going to happen. Hopefully, it never does. I think the fact that the US would respond in kind to any country that carried out such an attack keeps us safe from that sort of thing ever happening. But disasters do happen from time to time. When the 9 pointer hits the NW US, it will be similar locally to what EMP discussed here would be nationally.
of course nowadays, take out cell phones and every 12-30- year old will be calling for blood.
Sometimes we in the U.S. under or over-react to things, (compared to how I think at least), the changes seem to go in cycles.
I remember there was a joke about a sign in a bookstore that said something along the lines of 'Apocalyptic and dystopian fictional literature had been moved to the current events section.'
Thanks
Joel