MicroP25RX

btt

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2020
Messages
2,585
Location
Wa State
So this is a non-Motorola (Harris??) system and they do seem to use the SYS_ID instead of the FRSS for different "zones" within the same WACN, I'm not sure why they do this, maybe they just want to be different? I'm not that versed in non-Motorola systems but I think they would need to use an ISSI to link between the different SYS_IDs in the "system" but I'm not sure about that. If so, doing this would theoretically limit them on the number of talk groups that would be able to talk between SYS_IDs. To be honest I kind of forgot that they did this, definitely puts a bit of a bugger in trying to organize things.
I haven't looked to see if others organized large systems this way yet. I'm working toward having the MicroP25RX learn and store the network organization to flash memory (using LFS to prevent power glitch corruption of the file system). I think WACN-SYS_ID will work ok.
 

KMG54

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
1,257
Todd, would you like recording, or I should say logs of the palmetto 800 system? I have plenty. It still a phase 1 system but converting to phase 2 slowly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: btt

btt

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2020
Messages
2,585
Location
Wa State
Todd, would you like recording, or I should say logs of the palmetto 800 system? I have plenty. It still a phase 1 system but converting to phase 2 slowly.
Thank you. I would probably ask for some IQ recordings if you were having issues with demod/decode with a BTT receiver. I think the P1 and P2 demod / decode is in pretty good shape now. I do wish I had more P2 activity around here. The state-wide Wa DOT system I mentioned a couple of posts back has some P2 subscribers, but they hardly use the system. Last winter it was pretty active when there was snow. Other than that, I might only hear 1 or 2 short transmissions per day.
 

KMG54

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
1,257
I am just offering, only 2 P2 channels I have seen here. I want the micro2 so am offering my logs to help you out. I monitor the Palmetto 800 site with no simulcast problems in Pickens county, just a mile away from Greenville that I listen to. Just seeing if the logs from a simulcast system would help you.
 

btt

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2020
Messages
2,585
Location
Wa State
I am just offering, only 2 P2 channels I have seen here. I want the micro2 so am offering my logs to help you out. I monitor the Palmetto 800 site with no simulcast problems in Pickens county, just a mile away from Greenville that I listen to. Just seeing if the logs from a simulcast system would help you.
BTT receivers love simulcast systems! I know if you read posts on RR, you will see a lot of people say that SDS-100 and SDS-200 are the only receivers that do a good job with simulcast. Not true. The P25RX, P25RX-II, and MicroP25RX work great with simulcast systems! Technically, the issue with other manufacturers and "simulcast distortion" is really an issue with traditional FM demodulation not doing a good job on the Pi/4 DQPSK (LSM) demod. If you watch the video I posted a few posts back, you will see why. FM is a constant amplitude and LSM is not.
 

KMG54

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
1,257
I have been trying to find a portable solution for years. All my PC's and laptop work fine. They are to bulky for portable. I have a intel NUC running fine, but between the 5 inch screen a Power solution, aka a inverter it is not a solution Looking forward to the micro to come out. If you need a cash boost let me know, I am happy to pay 500 bucks to try one, if they come in at 200 bucks keep it toward research and development
 
  • Like
Reactions: btt

KMG54

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
1,257
BTT receivers love simulcast systems! I know if you read posts on RR, you will see a lot of people say that SDS-100 and SDS-200 are the only receivers that do a good job with simulcast. Not true. The P25RX, P25RX-II, and MicroP25RX work great with simulcast systems! Technically, the issue with other manufacturers and "simulcast distortion" is really an issue with traditional FM demodulation not doing a good job on the Pi/4 DQPSK (LSM) demod. If you watch the video I posted a few posts back, you will see why. FM is a constant magnitude and LSM is not. LSM is desirable because it focuses most of the energy *at* symbol time.
Thank you sir, PC has been offering better reception for years. Same for satellite reception can't get this can't get 4.2.2, Use your damn PC solution.
Most people need hand fed now a day's. I for one do not, of coours I will have questions, but would never expect a solution just handed to me
 

K9DAK

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
692
Location
Wauconda, IL
And that's why I always remind people about the BTT line of receivers when they post about simulcast problems with their scanners!

BTT receivers love simulcast systems! I know if you read posts on RR, you will see a lot of people say that SDS-100 and SDS-200 are the only receivers that do a good job with simulcast. Not true. The P25RX, P25RX-II, and MicroP25RX work great with simulcast systems! Technically, the issue with other manufacturers and "simulcast distortion" is really an issue with traditional FM demodulation not doing a good job on the Pi/4 DQPSK (LSM) demod. If you watch the video I posted a few posts back, you will see why. FM is a constant magnitude and LSM is not. LSM is desirable because it focuses most of the energy *at* symbol time.
 

KMG54

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
1,257
Just to join the newbie crowd. could you build a scanner for 20 bucks that will receive every format on every band?:love:
 
  • Like
Reactions: btt

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,039
Location
The OP
The WACN+SYS_ID would be the best way to uniquely identify a system. If the same "system" has more than one WACN+SYS_ID it would be connected via an Inter Subsystem Interface (ISSI) and technically would be two different "systems" connected together.

I'm not aware of any "systems" that have different WACN+SYS_IDs but I do know of many different "systems" that are connected via ISSI for interoperability reasons.

Edit: I should clarify, I have seen 'statewide' "systems" with some 'sites' that have different WACN+SYS_IDs but those are usually 'systems' that started out independently and were later joined together and instead of reprogramming all the radios for the new WACN+SYS_ID they just networked the 'sites' together via ISSI.
There is also a vendor-based limit to the number of sites per system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: btt

btt

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2020
Messages
2,585
Location
Wa State
@btt this new Analyzer tab is sweet! It really brings the signal and decodes to life. Great insight into what is happening inside the rig.
Thank you!
I thought of another point to mention about the video. If you are looking at the span wondering why it is 24kHz, then you might be interested to know that is because it is a multiple of the symbol rate. For P1 this is 4800 sym/sec. After all the fir filtering, decimation, and rate-resampling, the final rate before demod/decode is 5 x 4800 or 24000 samples/sec. For P2, the span would be 30 kHz, or 5 x 6000 samples /sec.
 

btt

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2020
Messages
2,585
Location
Wa State
There is also a vendor-based limit to the number of sites per system.
The limit is in the standard. 8-bit site information, so 255 sites per control channel. That is probably why they broke it up like that.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,039
Location
The OP
I think Motorola has a 50 site per core limit, but then you can have multiple cores / zones.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
15,481
Location
BEE00
I think Motorola has a 50 site per core limit, but then you can have multiple cores / zones.
150 sites (ASR and/or IP Simulcast) per ASTRO 25 zone (RFFS). That is the total number of Site ID's, obviously there can be more than 150 physical locations when you factor in IP Simulcast subsites.
 

FreqNout

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Messages
296
Location
Chicagoland
Thank you!
I thought of another point to mention about the video. If you are looking at the span wondering why it is 24kHz, then you might be interested to know that is because it is a multiple of the symbol rate. For P1 this is 4800 sym/sec. After all the fir filtering, decimation, and rate-resampling, the final rate before demod/decode is 5 x 4800 or 24000 samples/sec. For P2, the span would be 30 kHz, or 5 x 6000 samples /sec.
@btt it has a test equipment look to it now. Here is a geek question, is there a way to see the delay spread of the RF signal from the I/Q data?
 

btt

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2020
Messages
2,585
Location
Wa State
@btt it has a test equipment look to it now. Here is a geek question, is there a way to see the delay spread of the RF signal from the I/Q data?
It is a good question. I can't really say from my current location. I will record some IQ in one of the areas that sees multiple towers and post some images. Note in that last video I didn't have the reference frequency calibration done. I didn't catch that before making the video. When it is calibrated, the polar IQ plot has very well defined single-point peaks at symbol time (see attached image). I think as the delay spread increases, you will be able to see the effects of it, but I don't know how well you could identify it as such.
 

Attachments

  • Pi_4_DQPSK_LSM.png
    Pi_4_DQPSK_LSM.png
    11.5 KB · Views: 42

mws72

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 30, 2002
Messages
810
Location
Quad-Cities (IA-IL) USA
I was going ask if you could sell the circuit board and we could install the parts from a list you supply. Then we could return it for final assembly?
 

btt

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2020
Messages
2,585
Location
Wa State
I was going ask if you could sell the circuit board and we could install the parts from a list you supply. Then we could return it for final assembly?
The MicroP25RX analog boards have the passives installed and some of the semiconductors. I won't have as much work to do as the P25RX-II. Some of the parts are not common, but I have a large inventory of those. The digital board is a dev board that I am purchasing from a small business in Oregon. I don't know what his connections are in order to be able to buy MCU parts. Mouser, Digikey, Avenet, Newark do not have them in available. Chinese vendors are 10x to 100x higher for MCU parts right now.

The new LFS file system is working out nicely. It is fast, resistant to power-glitch corruption and is going to allow for some nice features. My current goal is to have the device be able to automatically self-configure for the most part. The rest of the configuration should be able to be easily done per site via the Wio buttons. The only thing that will require a PC is adding the talk group tags. That is the plan.

Another new development is the design of an enclosure that can be 3D printed by a regular in the forum here. There will be more information on that soon.
 
Top