I haven't looked to see if others organized large systems this way yet. I'm working toward having the MicroP25RX learn and store the network organization to flash memory (using LFS to prevent power glitch corruption of the file system). I think WACN-SYS_ID will work ok.So this is a non-Motorola (Harris??) system and they do seem to use the SYS_ID instead of the FRSS for different "zones" within the same WACN, I'm not sure why they do this, maybe they just want to be different? I'm not that versed in non-Motorola systems but I think they would need to use an ISSI to link between the different SYS_IDs in the "system" but I'm not sure about that. If so, doing this would theoretically limit them on the number of talk groups that would be able to talk between SYS_IDs. To be honest I kind of forgot that they did this, definitely puts a bit of a bugger in trying to organize things.