Delivers1234
Member
Anyone know about this?
They’ve discussed this on another forum. It appears that the Midland is the Retivis relabeled.![]()
GMRS Waterproof Repeater - MXR10
Take your two-way radio communication to the next level with the Midland MXR10 Repeater. This is the perfect solution for large farms & sprawling properties.midlandusa.com
Looks like it's along the lines of the Retrivis repeater. Low power, cheap flat pack duplexer.
Midland had relabeled several manufacturers repeaters over the last decade or so and offered them in various services (LMR, GMRS, etc). Doesn't surprise me that they are trying to cash in on GMRS.

Are they the same specs but with a midland label?Retevis. It's got DB9 pin out for external interfacing. It's perfect if you want to get a backyard repeater up and linked to one of the GMRS networks taking over GMRS. Retevis is pushing this theme. I might buy one myself just for funzies.
View attachment 134352
![]()
Retevis RT97S Full Duplex Portable GMRS Repeater | Plug and Play
Retevis RT97S GMRS Repeater with 8 channels, LCD Screen, support Raspberry Pi, and solar power charge, this compact gmrs repeater is a professional GMRS base station repeater that is easy to carry and support multiple power options; wide signal coverage and strong, ideal for beginners to boost...www.retevis.com
They’ve discussed this on another forum. It appears that the Midland is the Retivis relabeled.
Are they the same specs but with a midland label?
and Long Sold out , before the discussion began
and Long Sold out , before the discussion began
It looks like you can repeat all the gmrs channels at the same time. Is this correct?
A little searching would have revealed the manual. You select one channel.It looks like you can repeat all the gmrs channels at the same time. Is this correct?
It looks like you can repeat all the gmrs channels at the same time. Is this correct?
It looks like you can repeat all the gmrs channels at the same time. Is this correct?
It looks like you can repeat all the gmrs channels at the same time. Is this correct?