• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

motorola type/ smartnet and smartzone questions...

Status
Not open for further replies.

F16F35F14F18

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2023
Messages
22
No, ours looked different. It was a 3600 baud trunked system, but the controller looked much different than that one.
huh, interesting.

No, ours looked different. It was a 3600 baud trunked system, but the controller looked much different than that one.
you think you could describe what it looked like, and i could sketch it out, and see if it looks right, then ill see if i can find it out

No, ours looked different. It was a 3600 baud trunked system, but the controller looked much different than that one.
could it have been psc 9600 (might be to new, but its the only site controller im aware of )
s-l1200.webp


could it have been psc 9600 (might be to new, but its the only site controller im aware of )
s-l1200.webp
googling site controllers, theirs also the gcp-8000
g-series_front.png


googling site controllers, theirs also the gcp-8000
g-series_front.png
or perhaps an x502
s-l1600.jpg
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,130
Location
United States
huh, interesting.
This isn't a trunking controller, but our SmartNet controller was in a chassis that looked similar to this one:

There was a key switch that had to be turned before making any changes to the system, like taking one of the repeaters out of service.

And the "TIMI modems" that connected the trunking controller to our dispatch center CEB were these:
A primary and a spare. Plus an additional one for dial up admin.
 

F16F35F14F18

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2023
Messages
22
His system wouldn't have been any of those.
psc 9600 is used on p25 and iden i think, so probably not (also 9600 model probably also refers to baud rate perhaps). and i just googled site controllers and was asking hoping to jog his memory.
 

wa8pyr

Technischer Guru
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,198
Location
Ohio
No, ours looked different. It was a 3600 baud trunked system, but the controller looked much different than that one.

Sounds like the 6809 controller. When I started at my old job we had one of these on an 18-channel, two-site simulcast system. About a year later we got grant money to replace the flaky and unreliable 6809 controller with an MTC3600 controller and backup (such as pictured in Post #2) and two site controllers, one at the prime site and one at the subsite. The 3600s lasted until we migrated to P25 about 8 years later.

Like @mmckenna I don't remember what most of those acronyms meant; I was also glad when we traded all that stuff in toward the new P25 system, and Motorola e-wasted all of it.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,130
Location
United States
Sounds like the 6809 controller. When I started at my old job we had one of these on an 18-channel, two-site simulcast system. About a year later we got grant money to replace the flaky and unreliable 6809 controller with an MTC3600 controller and backup (such as pictured in Post #2) and two site controllers, one at the prime site and one at the subsite. The 3600s lasted until we migrated to P25 about 8 years later.

Yeah, it was the 6809, I'd completely forgotten that part.

Like @mmckenna I don't remember what most of those acronyms meant; I was also glad when we traded all that stuff in toward the new P25 system, and Motorola e-wasted all of it.

Motorola really wanted us to replace ours with a P25 system when we were doing the rebanding. After the horrible few years we'd had with the Motorola service contract, and which shop was in favor that year, I didn't even want to think about buying another Motorola product for a while.
 

KevinC

The big K
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2001
Messages
12,398
Location
Home
Are you guys saying the 2135 fit the 6809? Pretty sure it didn't...but I could be wrong.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2022
Messages
34
Hmmmm...still a lot more equipment than I was expecting.
I kind of figured that by this point in time, the controller would be a single box device with an ethernet cable leading to each repeater, with links to other sites via whatever transport mechanism is chosen. (Fiber, microwave, whatever.)

But where's the profit in that? Every box they can put in the racks adds thousands to the profit margin!

Are you guys saying the 2135 fit the 6809? Pretty sure it didn't...but I could be wrong.

2553
 

xmo

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
383
2553 = upright cabinet key.

Trivia question, the access key on the 6809 controller cards also was the same key used for the..?
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,130
Location
United States
Are you guys saying the 2135 fit the 6809? Pretty sure it didn't...but I could be wrong.
I don't recall, but I know it fit the cabinet the controller was in. I left the keys in the controller slots since it was in a locked cabinet in a secured room in a secured building.
 

xmo

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
383
Securenet box? Maybe - but there was this:
 

Attachments

  • key.png
    key.png
    545.7 KB · Views: 15

xmo

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
383
Another trivia question.

There were two 6809 controllers at a Smartzone 3 simulcast prime site, a main and a standby.

If you were working at the site and something went "Bzzzzt", what was that? It made you jump 6" - especially if it was your fault!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top