mmckenna
I ♥ Ø
I don't see any issues. If your frequency/NAC is correct and they are transmitting and you are in range, should work.
New CHP Extender Channel Assignments
- Thread starter officer_415
- Start date
I don't see any issues. If your frequency/NAC is correct and they are transmitting and you are in range, should work.
abraham1_2
Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2020
- Messages
- 6
Cool thanks, sometimes they come out as garble when they talk. I’ll mess with it more
You need to remove the RX CG: which is equivalent to PL.
Regards,
-Frank C.
KG6NLW
Socials: KG6NLW or Ham Radio Wilderness w/Frank (KG6NLW)
Picking up SD Office (87) units on the EV-20 alternate overnight...their APX's speakers were bleeping and booping a lot more than I remeember for some reason, and the old extender channel was not active. Do the officers need to select a specific channel on their handheld for use with the EV-20...assuming there is no active channel steering taking place.
Paul
Paul
NAC?
I was not paying attention, but it was whatever used to be tagged alternate in the RRDB, as that is what I have NAC in the scanner which was receiving the transmissions. Will confirm later tonight.
Paul
I would be surprised if that’s the case. The NACs formerly listed as alternate in the DB were for the old CPVE extenders and were not typically used.
The new EV-20 extenders seem to be using NAC EE6 statewide, but I’m trying to confirm in more areas before listing it in the DB.
What about TAN.
What about it?
Tan NAC did that change or stay the same?
Same as what?
Is it also EE6 or is it what it was prior to this thread?
For Border Tan (Oceanside):
The CPVE (older) extenders should be 769.18125, DAE NAC
The EV-20 (newer) extenders should be 769.66875, EE6 NAC
I think we've seen enough areas using NAC EE6 for the EV-20 extenders, so I've gone ahead and updated the DB statewide.
So what is the status of the old VHF-Extender freq. 154.905?
Every CHP unit has a VHF-Hi deck on-board now...is 154.905 now just a simplex tactical.
The VHF extender portables all had CLEMARS 154.920, CLEMARS Mobile 154.935, NALAMARS 154.475 and CALCORD. Some had local county/city freqs or DOJ, F&G depending of needs at the Area Office.
What happened to 154.905?
I doubt the state gave it up, is it now part of CRIS allocations?
Scan Sexy...
...on your G-E extender.
Every CHP unit has a VHF-Hi deck on-board now...is 154.905 now just a simplex tactical.
The VHF extender portables all had CLEMARS 154.920, CLEMARS Mobile 154.935, NALAMARS 154.475 and CALCORD. Some had local county/city freqs or DOJ, F&G depending of needs at the Area Office.
What happened to 154.905?
I doubt the state gave it up, is it now part of CRIS allocations?
Scan Sexy...
...on your G-E extender.
Yes.
NALEMARS is 155.475 MHz and the standard programming plan for the radio Extenders did not have 154.935 MHz.
The standard programming template for the old VHF radio extenders was as follows:
Ch. 1 - 154.905 MHz 192.8 Hz/no PL on Rx for car-to-station "S" Channel.
Ch. 2 - 154.905 MHz 173.8 Hz/ No PL on Rx for car-to-car "C" Channel.
Ch. 3 - 154.905 MHz no PL for talk-around the AVR for portable-to-portable
Ch. 4 - 154.920 MHz CLEMARS
Ch. 5 - 156.075 MHz CALCORD
Ch. 6 - 155.475 MHz NALEMARS
Ch. 7-15 - Local area custom programming
Ch. 16 - Local Area Programming or 154.905 MHz 210.7 Hz No PL on Rx for Motorcycle AVR control.
154.935 MHz was only used in a handful of portables for special ops.
154.905 MHz probably would be used in the northern part of the State for the new system
I hate to throw a wrench in the works, but CHP South Lake Tahoe EV-20 extenders are using EE4 NAC. All of the other areas I've heard have been using EE6 NAC. I'm inclined to change all the EV-20 extender freqs back to open tone in the DB for now...
