• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

(New Version) ANYTONE 6666 Pro

Status
Not open for further replies.

niceguy71

Active Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2023
Messages
1,135
Reaction score
1,513
Location
Massachusetts
I just ordered a second QT-40 to install in my truck. They're $149 on Amazon right now. The QT80, I will sell or set it up as a base unit. I have noticed that the QT-40 in my jeep is much easier to adjust on the fly while out on the trails.
seeing you have both, I would love to hear a full description of the reasons for and against for either radio...

the QT-40 only has 40 watts.. but I think that's more than enough...
my old President Grant came with 10 watts AM/FM and 25 on SSB .... I'm pretty sure it beats my 60 watt QT-60

I looked at the QT-40 a long time ago and even watched some YouTube video's on it.... I thought it was a nice looking radio for the old timers that couldn't learn the new menu radios....... now that I've had my QT-60 in my vehicle .... I see the QT-40 through different eyes

I have to admit...... that QT-40 looks like a total winner especially for the $150 price tag!
 

Davidbt

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2024
Messages
171
Reaction score
248
Location
Sierra Vista, Arizona
seeing you have both, I would love to hear a full description of the reasons for and against for either radio...

the QT-40 only has 40 watts.. but I think that's more than enough...
my old President Grant came with 10 watts AM/FM and 25 on SSB .... I'm pretty sure it beats my 60 watt QT-60

I looked at the QT-40 a long time ago and even watched some YouTube video's on it.... I thought it was a nice looking radio for the old timers that couldn't learn the new menu radios....... now that I've had my QT-60 in my vehicle .... I see the QT-40 through different eyes

I have to admit...... that QT-40 looks like a total winner especially for the $150 price tag!
I think your right about 40 watts being plenty for a radio. Having the QT40 in my jeep has allowed me to see how easier it is to operate. The QT80 requires you to observe the screen more while changing functions. I just feel that the QT40 will be safer to use while underway in the truck. It's definitely easier to adjust knobs than pushing buttons and trying to look at the screen.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
3,969
Reaction score
3,954
Location
Fort Worth
One memorizes function change by touch.

The radio that’s always ready needs the operator to also be up to speed.

.
 

niceguy71

Active Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2023
Messages
1,135
Reaction score
1,513
Location
Massachusetts
I think your right about 40 watts being plenty for a radio. Having the QT40 in my jeep has allowed me to see how easier it is to operate. The QT80 requires you to observe the screen more while changing functions. I just feel that the QT40 will be safer to use while underway in the truck. It's definitely easier to adjust knobs than pushing buttons and trying to look at the screen.
I'm going to keep my QT-60 in the truck for a while and see if I get used to it....

my fingers are used to 36 years of touching the old President Grant.... but that QT-40 is VERY similar to my old Grant

since I've been a member here everyone recommends the 5555 N II or QT-60 radio... and I took that advice and set up my base station and thought it was the greatest radio on the planet.... but I'm starting to think the group should be suggesting the QT-40 for mobile installations?

but until I actually have one for 6 months I would never give advice on it.
 

Davidbt

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2024
Messages
171
Reaction score
248
Location
Sierra Vista, Arizona
One memorizes function change by touch.

The radio that’s always ready needs the operator to also be up to speed.

.
I've turned the wrong knobs several times on the QT80. I'd be lying if I said my memory was ever great. When I installed it in my truck, I thought that I would get used to it by touch, and it's just not very easy to switch from AM to LSB and turn up the power. I have done it with the QT40 out on a trail and made several contacts.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
3,969
Reaction score
3,954
Location
Fort Worth
I used an index card to help train.
I don’t need full radio function-set while moving.
 

Davidbt

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2024
Messages
171
Reaction score
248
Location
Sierra Vista, Arizona
I used an index card to help train.
I don’t need full radio function-set while moving.
I get that. One shouldn't have to change channels while rolling down the road. I have tried to adjust the squelch down a little while driving and turned the wrong adjustment Knob. I just feel that the QT40 is easier to use memory to make adjustments on the fly. Even adjusting the mic gain can be done without going into the settings pushing a button. I just think it's a better type of radio for a mobile, like the one in my jeep. Last year you suggested using my antenna in my truck with a long cable using my QT80 as a base. I think this is the way I will go.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
3,969
Reaction score
3,954
Location
Fort Worth
CB as a tool?
QT40 has a useless meter.

— Distinguishing Skip from Local matters and isn’t always obvious by audio qualities.

Besides, the only functions while underway are:

1). Volume
2). RFG
3). SQ

The rest are worked as pre-sets. Then left alone.


CB as a toy?
(QSO contacts)

— The criticisms don’t apply as they’ve naught to do with safe vehicle operation. Therefore aren’t in use by operator while moving. False concern.


Running around in a local bubble covers up what’s what. Get partway across the country and into conditions which differ per climate, terrain, traffic volume (and demographic) and what matters for radio operation gets real clear, real quick when few options exist for the driver to avoid problems.

One can try to chase a contact due to Skip or an intersecting major road unawares and have lost the only thing of value in risk avoidance: Time (distance). Need-to-Know is measured in seconds. (Relative signal strength).

Arizona ain’t Wisconsin.
Neither of them are Mississippi or Texas.

Saying, “Well, I won’t be going those places”, doesn’t reflect what’s possible. The factors listed above work together. As analogy ones automobile needs to work well summer or winter. “Be Prepared”, therefore, isn’t just for one’s home as one may leave and never see it again. (Ask residents of Lahaina, Pacfic Palisades, or Swannanoa). Don’t shortchange mobile radio choice.

Same for when running low on BATT reserve when engine has problems. One has hopefully used a visual reference for training his ears prior to that day. Ever had to count off down to last PTT?


A minor training problem ain’t a radio spec problem. Less isn’t more.

Baptism by fire
can be painful.

(NRC) AM/SSB recommended isn’t by “cool toy” standard. Meter, and minimal training, are necessary for full use under widest variations.

.
 
Last edited:

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
3,969
Reaction score
3,954
Location
Fort Worth
Once one is out on the road these stories are “you“:






IMG_8608.jpeg


“Oh, but I have a cell phone”.

There are those of us who traveled this continent 3-4 decades prior to such. Hand-drawn maps and a sextant, I guess.

“Here be monsters”.


Radio
is a big, “Last Chance”.

I get a kick out of those who’d advise those of us who stake health & wealth on safe travel as to what’s important and what isn’t for road comms. Open-mindedness — and testing — as habit came long ago. Take that in whatever fashion “you” choose.

Best rig in the mobile.

.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top