Looking at the difficiency list document (that is linked earlier in this thread), and the article from "Urgent", I can't imagin how MA/Com could suggest that the problems are of NY's making. It seems pretty clear that there were problems, an opportunity for MA/Com to resolve, retesting, an other opportunity to resolve, testing again, and the termination of the contract. All this took place over more than a year.
More than enough time to find some sort of resolution. Many of these problems were clearly QC or QA process problems.
Wx4cbh, I think you hit the nail on the head.
Cheers
Victor