Receive only antenna for HF

W4BSR

Newbie
Joined
Jul 26, 2025
Messages
1
Having returned from my first Field Day, I see how a receive only antenna can be used with multiple rigs running in a small area. So, what can it do for me at home with just one rig at a time? Is there a benefit to having a dedicated multi-band/ long wire, etc. for receiving only? (Thanks in advance!)73
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,532
Location
Central Indiana
The answer, like a lot of things in amateur radio, is "it depends".

A friend is big into 160m DXing. Building effective 160m antennas is a challenge due to their size. He used to have a top-loaded vertical that he used for transmitting, with 1500 watts, on 160m. But, in order to receive weak stations on that band, he built a "Beverage on ground" (BoG) antenna just for receiving. His radio was set up so that he received using the BoG, but when he transmitted, his radio switched to his vertical. Beverage On Ground! – N5ZY
 

Skypilot007

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
2,587
Location
Medford, NJ
A lot of rigs have a receive only antenna port. Check your rig for that and if you decide to make one and use it you should be able to configure the rig to receive with the receive only antenna and transmit on the other antenna.
 

merlin

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,656
Location
DN32su
That can be anything like from a 35 foot piece of wire to a full T3FD or full wave Rhombic.
Mag loops do well for their compact size.
There is a lot of good reading about HF RX antennas on SWLing dot com.
Much depends on the coverage you want, my main HF RX antenna is 84 foot end fed wire with autotuner and can transmit up to 150 watts.
Does well but 160 meters is not the best of performance. Above 2 MHz to 60 MHz, I cant complain.
 
Last edited:

Token

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,473
Location
Mojave Desert, California, USA
The answer, like a lot of things in amateur radio, is "it depends".

A friend is big into 160m DXing. Building effective 160m antennas is a challenge due to their size. He used to have a top-loaded vertical that he used for transmitting, with 1500 watts, on 160m. But, in order to receive weak stations on that band, he built a "Beverage on ground" (BoG) antenna just for receiving. His radio was set up so that he received using the BoG, but when he transmitted, his radio switched to his vertical. Beverage On Ground! – N5ZY

I have done something similar, also on 160 M. In my case I use primarily two transmit antennas on 160, a full size inverted V or a full sized sky loop, and while those two antennas are great on receive, having more options is very nice. I often use either a Beverage or a mag loop on receive. The mag loop gives me a steerable directionality that would have been hard to achieve on 160 by other means. I used this receive directionality less to peak signals, and more to null offending signals, including noise sources.

T!
 

jwt873

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
1,775
Location
Woodlands, Manitoba
I'm curious as to what they used for a receive antenna at your field day... How did it outperform the TX antennas, and how did they connect it to multiple radios at once?

FWIW, I use a Wellbrook Loop as a receive antenna. It's primarily for receiving signals below 5 MHz. I occasionally DX the Broadcast Band and the NDB aviation beacons. It also works fairly well on the 630 and 2200 meter ham bands.
 
Top