Riverside city TRS

AEFI

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2023
Messages
149
Reaction score
46
Location
East Valley San Bernardino County
I was looking at the db and saw this, The notes for the license say its for the city of Riverside. Are they going to move away from PSEC? Is fire going on here or are they going to let the license expire. Im not in the area to see if the CC is active if someone can check.

Database Entry
 

Randyk4661

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
677
Reaction score
602
Location
Garden Grove, CA
They better hurry up.
The license for the Riverside system expires January next year.
It's been licensed for nine years and still not active?
 

monitor142

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
367
Reaction score
130
Location
California
This system has been in the design phase for a while. I believe that the main user focus will be public services for the city and PD and FD can use it as a back up as necessary. It also will give the city good interoperability as needed on their own infrastructure.

-M142
 

AEFI

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2023
Messages
149
Reaction score
46
Location
East Valley San Bernardino County
There is this thread as well from 2017 that touches on it but with no real information.

 

B

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
68
Reaction score
68
Location
Vista, Ca.
Watch this YouTube vide of them testing the PSEC radio system. I can see why they would like their own system.


Wow, great find and what an eye opener...
 

MiCon

Mike
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
324
Reaction score
435
Location
central AZ
I spent 48 years in Riverside but moved out of state three years ago. I visit soCal almost monthly, but not Riverside. I usually stay in the SG Valley area. Was there for Christmas two weeks ago and heard RFD still using 460.575 PL123.0. Per my notes for last year, they were also still using 460.6 PL97.4 as well as 154.175 PL141.3. I don't have any digital scanners, so I won't be able to check their P25 system. I'd be interested in hearing what the end result will be.
 

Engine104

Member since 2005
Joined
Jul 6, 2005
Messages
669
Reaction score
323
Location
Winnetka, CA
Great video. Thanks for sharing it. The FF down/PASS system example was particularly concerning, obviously. I wonder if the LACoFD did similar tests on LA-RICS and based their decision to keep most of their ops on analog UHF. ICI uses P-25 trunked and it seems to work ok? Any known issues with that?
 

Markb

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 21, 2002
Messages
1,389
Reaction score
231
Location
Planet Earth
This test was done at least 10 years ago and likely with either no or bad noise reduction configured in the test radio(s) and likely with the old CODEC where this was a known problem.

Departments all over the country use P25 trunking and while yes, it does have some potential vulnerabilities, as long as those are recognized and planned for, it's not that big of a deal.

Riverside county fire agencies are planning on using analog simplex tactical channels for IDLH (Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health) operations as agencies continue to cut over.
 

k6rvc

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 30, 2021
Messages
6
Reaction score
9
Location
Grand Terrace
There is a couple the municipal department within Riverside County are looking to join the PSEC system, i do understand the interoperability between agencies, not the total encryption of all fire talk groups, maybe one or two encrypted channels. I'm not a fan of Phase 2, the phase 1 sounds a lot better with fire ground operations, and SCBA
 

f40ph

CC actual
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
763
Reaction score
243
Location
Largest County, USA
I found this but I am unsure if its there TRS or PSEC
Those in building requirements are for their current Analog Conventional System. They aren't requiring compliance with 700mhz freqs at this time (probably because they're not using the TRS).
 

wqmg930

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2022
Messages
36
Reaction score
24
Location
Riverside
Quick question here - while testing the 2 systems does this explain the digital interference they had - that was horrible
 

f40ph

CC actual
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
763
Reaction score
243
Location
Largest County, USA
If you're asking about the in-building requirements, that has nothing to do with the video above.
 

I_Am_Infinite

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Messages
452
Reaction score
195
Location
Sumava Resorts, IN (Newton County)
Watch this YouTube vide of them testing the PSEC radio system. I can see why they would like their own system.

Omg that 700 system is terrible essentially all the time... Man being down and no audio is awful, life and death situation and can't even get comms out...big time safety issues. On side not that antenna on the far right radio is so bent 🤣
 
Top