I heard that as well. But I will bet that the dispatcher hit a button disabling encryption or was at a console that had the encryption disabled.
What’s interesting is you only hear the dispatcher and the units in the field are all digitized and encryptedI heard that as well. But I will bet that the dispatcher hit a button disabling encryption or was at a console that had the encryption disabled.
Heard from a different mail list that La Mesa PD is now encrypted. Have not had time to verify yet.
Just heard Chula Vista engine 51 say "CLEARED IN ON PD RADIO". Correct me if I am wrong, but CVFD firefighters and paramedics are not CLETS authorized, and cannot legally monitor the encrypted comms? This is the excuse the agencies are giving the media why they are not permittted to allow us access, because only approved law enforcement entities are CLETS authorized.
Paul
"CLETS Authorized" is sort of a loose/generalized term.
The authorization comes from FBI. I have to do the training periodically since I'm around CLETS terminals in our PSAP as well as stuff on the radio. There's a couple of levels:
State and Federal statutes, regulations and policies require that employees that have access to confidential criminal information be certified in the proper handling of sensitive information.Per FBI CJIS Security Policy regulation 5.2, all employees are required to take and pass an appropriate level proficiency test for their level of access. The three levels of access are:· Full Access Operators (users with functionality to do inquiries and updates)--Dispatch and Records units, Chief/Lieutenant· Less Than Full Access Operators (inquiries only)—Chief/Lieutenant, Sergeants & Officers· Practitioner (indirect access to general information, this test is focused solely on security)--Parking Officers, Administrative/Office Staff
I fall under the "Practitioner", as in I'm not running inquires and I'm not directly handling information.
Fire would fall under the same level.
I seem to recall it taking about 30 minutes total, probably a bit less. It's not hard stuff to learn. In my role it comes down to:
If you see something you don't need to see, you don't look at it, you don't read it, you unsee it and you keep your mouth shut.If you hear something you don't need to hear, you don't listen, you unhear it, and again, you keep your mouth shut.Essentially it's like most IT security stuff. If you don't have business with the information, you avoid it. If you have to see/hear/taste/smell it, you never repeat it and you don't share it with someone else.
Failing that, it's possible for one to lose their job if they don't abide by the rules. Worst case, the agency loses their CLETS access. Probably if someone was stupid enough, they could face a judge.
Since most of us really like our super high paying, luxury, cushy government jobs, we tend to follow the rules. (Ask me about my Rolex, APX and Ferrari collection).
It made it most of the way but did not make it out of one of the budget committees because of “who will pay the bills” concerns. SB1000 per the author will be reintroduced next year.Any updates on whether or not it has made it to the governors desk for signing regarding the encryption bill.TIA
Any updates on whether or not it has made it to the governors desk for signing regarding the encryption bill.TIA
Any updates on whether or not it has made it to the governors desk for signing regarding the encryption bill.TIA
The governor is an idiot and wouldn't do anything to promote freedoms within the state anyway.It's dead.
Sure, it may come back next year, but it'll probably be dead then too.
There were a lot of groups against this bill. It was never a slam dunk case, and won't be in the future.
The governor is an idiot and wouldn't do anything to promote freedoms within the state anyway.
What do you mean?A lot of agencies, like Chicago are showing us what the future may be???
The thing is, close doesn't count. A bill can clear multiple hurdles only because the lawmakers involved have assurances from later hurdles that they will not pass it. It's all about political deals, whose seat is at risk, etc.. Makes me ill to think about it.I think the bill did a lot better then I thought it would. ...
Chicago and Eugene Oregon, and others post their dispatch traffic with a time delay, so people can know what their hero's are doing while making it impossible for criminals to take advantage of said information. A great way for a LEA to generate traffic to their web sites as well.What do you mean?