SDS200 And 100

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
10,757
Reaction score
4,531
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
When I read the customer reviews on Amazon it seems that high endurance cards sometimes fail sooner than "normal" cards. I have the original SD card in my Homepatrol-1 and have more or less 5 hours use every day with replay recording enabled for almost 10 years now. The dashcam in my car use the same standard 32GB SD card that gets full two times a week since 5 years back. The only SD card or USB memory that have failed for me where the one included in a Whistler scanner that where faulty from first time power up and cannot be reformatted.

/Ubbe
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Reaction score
3,909
Location
S.E. Michigan
When I read the customer reviews on Amazon it seems that high endurance cards sometimes fail sooner than "normal" cards. I have the original SD card in my Homepatrol-1 and have more or less 5 hours use every day with replay recording enabled for almost 10 years now. The dashcam in my car use the same standard 32GB SD card that gets full two times a week since 5 years back. The only SD card or USB memory that have failed for me where the one included in a Whistler scanner that where faulty from first time power up and cannot be reformatted.

/Ubbe

I drank the Kool Aid and bought a Samsung PRO Endurance 32gb Micro SD card for the 436HP. 32gb is far bigger than you could ever possibly need, but that was the smallest they make. But I think some of us have been a little mislead as to what we gain buying the "Endurance" cards. The more I read it's not about how many reads and writes they can do. It's about how they stand up to abuse, temperature, shock, humidity, etc. I think all Micro SD cards are very robust in that regard, in fact almost indestructible! They also tend to be capable of faster reads/writes. I don't think that's a big factor either. Scanners do not read and write at fast speeds. Someone else mentioned recently that the larger cards tend to boot up slower in scanners.

The most important performance/reliability factor IMHO is the card's edge contacts. If you can even find them buy one that has real gold plated contacts. They would be optimium for being corosion resistant, preventing any electrical resistance or intermittent contact. The slightest interruption in the connection to the scanner would cause failure. It's probably a good idea to occasionally remove the card and buff the edge contacts with a cloth or a pencil eraser and give them a wipe of electrical contact cleaner. That and the act of removing and reinserting the card will also help the card to wipe the contacts in the socket and give them a better contact/conductance.
 

Hit_Factor

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
2,681
Reaction score
1,450
Location
Saint Joseph, MI
They also tend to be capable of faster reads/writes. I don't think that's a big factor either. Scanners do not read and write at fast speeds. Someone else mentioned recently that the larger cards tend to boot up slower in scanners.

From what I recall in my 436 and sds100s they came with class 4 cards and no other marking except for 8gb. I replaced them with class 10 cards and the do indeed boot faster, receive the master db updates faster, and load the full db faster.

The larger could have been slower, but that's an incomplete spec, it wasn't slow due to its size, sdcards don't work that way. It could have been class 4 ( not sure that's even for sale these days) or maybe the card had a corrupt file system.
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
10,757
Reaction score
4,531
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
I don't know if Uniden checks the integrity of the partitioned part of the SD card but Whistler do. And it's a huge difference in boot time if it's a 2GB partition or a full 32GB on a 32GB SD card in a Whistler. But that seems to be the result of a very slow data link between remote head and scanner as both USB and SD card speed are ridicously slow.

/Ubbe
 

Hit_Factor

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
2,681
Reaction score
1,450
Location
Saint Joseph, MI
I don't know if Uniden checks the integrity of the partitioned part of the SD card but Whistler do. And it's a huge difference in boot time if it's a 2GB partition or a full 32GB on a 32GB SD card in a Whistler. But that seems to be the result of a very slow data link between remote head and scanner as both USB and SD card speed are ridicously slow.

/Ubbe
This is a sds100/200 thread, none of this is relevant.
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
10,757
Reaction score
4,531
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
Is it true that the higher the GB card the longer it takes to load in the radio ?
Larger cards do make the radio take a little bit longer time to boot up
I don't know if Uniden checks the integrity of the partitioned part of the SD card but Whistler do. And it's a huge difference in boot time
This is a sds100/200 thread, none of this is relevant.

I just wanted to explain why it could take longer to boot a bigger card in a SDS100/200 as any SD card handler in any type of device needs to read the filesystem and check how much free memory there is and other parameters.

/Ubbe
 

KK4JUG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2014
Messages
4,610
Reaction score
3,318
Location
GA
I just wanted to explain why it could take longer to boot a bigger card in a SDS100/200 as any SD card handler in any type of device needs to read the filesystem and check how much free memory there is and other parameters.

/Ubbe
4GB vs. 32GB: How much time are we talking about?
 

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
6,412
Reaction score
5,698
Location
Far NW Valley
4GB vs. 32GB: How much time are we talking about?
Not long, a matter of up to 15 seconds or so on startup, perhaps less. While I haven't ever measured the time, it seems like forever when watching the radio but in actuality it is not long.
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Reaction score
3,909
Location
S.E. Michigan
Not long, a matter of up to 15 seconds or so on startup, perhaps less. While I haven't ever measured the time, it seems like forever when watching the radio but in actuality it is not long.

It would be nice if Sentinel could omit Canada's portion of the database from loading every time the scanner is turned on. Not a big deal, but I run four scanners and it is an unnecessary annoyance.
 

Hit_Factor

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
2,681
Reaction score
1,450
Location
Saint Joseph, MI
It would be nice if Sentinel could omit Canada's portion of the database from loading every time the scanner is turned on. Not a big deal, but I run four scanners and it is an unnecessary annoyance.
You can go into the Canadian portion and avoid them in Sentinel. Living in Michigan, I get close enough frequently.

73, K8HIT
Icom: IC-7300, IC-PW1, ID-5100A, ID-51A Plus 2, IC-R30, Hytera PD782G, Kenwood TH-D74, Uniden SDS100, DVMega, SDRplay RSPduo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top