• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

TM-9900 multiband P25/DMR mobile

ATK3

Member
Joined
May 28, 2024
Messages
30
Even beyond the interoperability arguments in the US, DMR is incredibly prevalent in public safety internationally, and will continue to gain traction with smaller departments in the US - conventional TDMA is something P25 can't do, and "double your traffic capacity at a lower cost" is a fairly effective sales pitch.
 

ATK3

Member
Joined
May 28, 2024
Messages
30
The fact that this thing can drop into an install that's had an APX 4500 or XPR 4550/5550 dashmount is seriously impressive. I was already impressed with how small the TP9900 is, but if this is priced right, I think it'll do quite well.
 

wsp44

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
137
The fact that this thing can drop into an install that's had an APX 4500 or XPR 4550/5550 dashmount is seriously impressive. I was already impressed with how small the TP9900 is, but if this is priced right, I think it'll do quite well.
it is seriously impressive, while everybody else has gotten bigger, they maintained the same foot print, and didn’t compromise any power output.
 

d119

Patch & Channels Clear...
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
694
Location
EM1's guest house.
Motorola guys sitting at their booth at IWCE like....

"BuT DmR dOeSn'T bElOnG iN a PuBlIc SafeTeY rAdIo":ROFLMAO:
Motorola doesn't attend IWCE any more. I guess they figure they're too good for it now. Or they got shamed out of there. Same thing with L3Harris. Been that way for a few years now.

So, more like "Motorola guys sitting at their booth at APCO like..."

Motorola's lack of presence at IWCE makes it a bit more enjoyable, actually. IWCE is showing the world that there are alternatives, and it's interesting to see the major players that show up to IWCE that are clearly not hooked on Motorola's bull____.

I just bought $500k worth of EFWood stuff at work, and two VM8000's personally, you'd better believe there are better alternatives out there than Motorola.

I "upgraded" from an XL200m to the VM8000 in my car, and I don't think either RF unit are really "massive". They are both radios that are meant for remote installation. Clearly the Tait offering is meant for dash. You're comparing apples to oranges.

And yes, I know the VM and XL *can* be dash mounted...
 

ve2hkw

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
19
Location
Hemmingford Quebec
Even beyond the interoperability arguments in the US, DMR is incredibly prevalent in public safety internationally, and will continue to gain traction with smaller departments in the US - conventional TDMA is something P25 can't do, and "double your traffic capacity at a lower cost" is a fairly effective sales pitch.
Yeah, I've heard many people say to switch from DMR to p25 Conv. for our single frequency pair setup and I just don't see the logic... I wish the TDMA p25 could operate on a single frequency repeater..... You'd have people clamoring all over that I'd imagine.
 

d119

Patch & Channels Clear...
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
694
Location
EM1's guest house.
Yeah, I've heard many people say to switch from DMR to p25 Conv. for our single frequency pair setup and I just don't see the logic... I wish the TDMA p25 could operate on a single frequency repeater..... You'd have people clamoring all over that I'd imagine.
One of the things I brought up to the P25 steering committee members at IWCE last month was the need for Phase II P25 conventional. Essentially what I was told is that if there is a legitimate demand/business case and enough people speak up about it, they'll address it.

Since DMR is now an option for public safety agencies (as much as the manufacturers don't like it), and trunking is an expense that smaller agencies without regional systems can't bear, "they" would be wise to start working on P25 Phase II conventional lest people (conventional users) just say screw it and start moving away from P25 (or analog) in favor of DMR.

If they want the protocol to survive in the non-trunking environment, that's the only way to go. Otherwise, if you can't afford trunking, well, DMR is where everyone's going. It sells itself.

Now that has to be public safety/commercial/etc. that speaks up - amateurs and hobbyists have absolutely no voice with these people whatsoever.

My interest was for work. I was one of two folks who spoke up about this.
 
Last edited:

12dbsinad

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
2,020
Motorola doesn't attend IWCE any more. I guess they figure they're too good for it now. Or they got shamed out of there. Same thing with L3Harris. Been that way for a few years now.

So, more like "Motorola guys sitting at their booth at APCO like..."

Motorola's lack of presence at IWCE makes it a bit more enjoyable, actually. IWCE is showing the world that there are alternatives, and it's interesting to see the major players that show up to IWCE that are clearly not hooked on Motorola's bull____.

I just bought $500k worth of EFWood stuff at work, and two VM8000's personally, you'd better believe there are better alternatives out there than Motorola.

I "upgraded" from an XL200m to the VM8000 in my car, and I don't think either RF unit are really "massive". They are both radios that are meant for remote installation. Clearly the Tait offering is meant for dash. You're comparing apples to oranges.

And yes, I know the VM and XL *can* be dash mounted...
Not really comparing apples to oranges here. The Tait is not meant for just dash mount as most newer vehicles don't even have a dash to mount anything anymore, unless it's mounted in a aftermarket console box. The control head on a XL-200M is massive compared to the Tait, which is what I was getting at.
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
7,189
Location
Sector 001
Yeah, I've heard many people say to switch from DMR to p25 Conv. for our single frequency pair setup and I just don't see the logic... I wish the TDMA p25 could operate on a single frequency repeater..... You'd have people clamoring all over that I'd imagine.
The logic is voice quality, active noise canceling amd audio processing. P25 is light-years ahead of DMR. P25 phase 2 is going to sound similar to DMR, because they both use the same half rate vocoder.

With P25 phase 1, you get the full rate AMBE+ vocoder.
 

ATK3

Member
Joined
May 28, 2024
Messages
30
The logic is voice quality, active noise canceling amd audio processing. P25 is light-years ahead of DMR. P25 phase 2 is going to sound similar to DMR, because they both use the same half rate vocoder.

With P25 phase 1, you get the full rate AMBE+ vocoder.
Motorola's DMR implementation absolutely has major audio quality marks against it, especially compared to how good the APX offering is, however, when you start looking beyond Motorola for subscribers, the field really evens out. Tait's subscribers (even older models like the TP9300) sound excellent, and the VP8000 is far and away the best sounding DMR radio I've ever used. In my honest opinion, its indistinguishable from P25 conv in real environments, and its twice as spectrally efficient. You get all the same noise reduction and cancellation bells and whistles you do in P25 mode, and its running on the same DSPs.

DMR gets an incredibly poor reputation in the US thanks to Motorola's implementation of it. MotoTRBO is intentionally held back in so many respects, both with subscribers and infrastructure. Its clearly done to sell ASTRO systems and subscribers to small departments and largers businesses who may otherwise view DMR as a potential cheaper alternative to P25. As vendors other than Motorola gain traction, and DMR continues to be taken seriously, I can absolutely see it gaining a stronger foothold here in the US. DMR already is common in public safety use outside of the US, and as vendors bring those products here, its going to become a very real alternative to P25 in the right environment.
 
Top