SNIP
Rebar? You inspect it before it goes in the ground. Concrete? You watch the pours. A third party guy tests every batch.
When the project is wrapped up, you have a great system that meets user needs and maybe even a public thank-you from the county board for a job well done and staying within budget.
View attachment 103620View attachment 103621View attachment 103623
I was literally too shocked to even call him on it.
the sales rep said, "You're not gonna have VHF-Hi at all much longer because they're giving it over to Civil Aviation."
----------------------
There are scoundrels in every field. You can't let them get to you. Just turn things around and say:
'Thank you for bringing that to our attention. I must have missed it. If you can provide us with a copy of the FCC R&O, we can put that in our IJ documentation and get this project moving because, I am afraid, without that, we will simply have to stay right where we are.'
If it's B.S. you won't hear from him again.
I can't even imaging the behind doors goings-on in a project the size of Florida.
IIRC, Florida had a Motorola system back in the day and the SLERS project went to the other company - CCS or whatever name they went by at that time.
Motorola fought it that time too and got no where. Harder still now with an entrenched system.
I was hoping some of you 4-landers close to the situation would fill us in.
Likely caused by the slump being wrong and it bridged up over the rebar structure. But yeah, if 3 out of 4 holes take 8 yards of concrete and 1 hole only takes 2, that would be a red flag that something isn’t quite right.Such an optimistic perfect world!
There was a picture circulating around here from a few years back. I think it was Riviera Beach PD. A hurricane put extreme overturning moment on their self supported tower. One leg pulled completely out of the ground (sandy soil) . Only about 1/4 of the upper portion of that leg had any concrete. It was bare rebar all the rest of the way down. The hole apparently closed in before the pour began. The contractor had to know there was a problem when he sent all those unused concrete trucks home.
Reading this thread reminds me of a meeting I attended several years back when a certain vendor was trying to get all of the VFD's off of our old analog system (which worked fine) and onto the statewide TSYS. Literally right after telling us that we would "always have" our VHF-Hi Dispatch frequency for paging, the sales rep said, "You're not gonna have VHF-Hi at all much longer because they're giving it over to Civil Aviation."
I was literally too shocked to even call him on it.
Likely caused by the slump being wrong and it bridged up over the rebar structure. But yeah, if 3 out of 4 holes take 8 yards of concrete and 1 hole only takes 2, that would be a red flag that something isn’t quite right.
Sounds like a similar situation I ran into. When I asked the Motorola rep why we couldn’t just stay on VHF and go P25. We already had enough frequency pairs on our license to do so. As well as the fact that we received a grant from the state a year earlier that allowed us to purchase a few dozen APX6000’s in VHF. His answer was “P25 isn’t available in VHF, you have to go to 700/800 to get P25”.
My response, “Soo the state police is just pretending to talk on P25 VHF”?
He immediately realized at that point that he wa no longer the smartest person in that room. Maybe he thought his arrogance somehow afforded him the right to think he could pull the wool over the eyes of a small county. Unfortunately my cries of “were getting ripped off” fell on deaf ears. As they had already buffaloed the powers that be.
We live in a throw away society. And it’s easy to do it with OPM. SMHI had an old client with an analog SN II 800 system send me a copy of the /\/\ quote to refresh the police fleet with new radios. I pointed out that the quote was for digital equipped radios (P25 CAI) and that neither they nor any surrounding agencies had P25 systems and that well over a half million dollars could be saved by simply changing the order to "digital ready" radios and they could always flash them later (if required). They spent the money anyway. Then some years later the system was up for replacement (Mixed mode 3600 SZ P25 CAI) and the city comission letter stated that that a sole source procurement was justified because of the "FCC Digital Mandate". Those P25 CAI radios? They got replaced again. Never used in P25 mode. They are on their third system now.
My input at that meeting was neither welcome nor desired. I discovered later that things at the County level had already been decided, it was just a matter of how many radios each Dept. could afford but we had to get equipped. My intended function was to help convince the people back home that we needed to spend all of this money, which I refused to do. And when I tried to tell some folks in my own Dept that I'd checked and discovered most of what he told us to be Bravo Sierra, nobody wanted to believe me or look it up for themselves. Eyes dazzled by new gear...this was ca. 2009-ish and the old VHF analog repeater is still working just fine.Likely caused by the slump being wrong and it bridged up over the rebar structure. But yeah, if 3 out of 4 holes take 8 yards of concrete and 1 hole only takes 2, that would be a red flag that something isn’t quite right.
Sounds like a similar situation I ran into. When I asked the Motorola rep why we couldn’t just stay on VHF and go P25. We already had enough frequency pairs on our license to do so. As well as the fact that we received a grant from the state a year earlier that allowed us to purchase a few dozen APX6000’s in VHF. His answer was “P25 isn’t available in VHF, you have to go to 700/800 to get P25”.
My response, “Soo the state police is just pretending to talk on P25 VHF”?
He immediately realized at that point that he wa no longer the smartest person in that room. Maybe he thought his arrogance somehow afforded him the right to think he could pull the wool over the eyes of a small county. Unfortunately my cries of “were getting ripped off” fell on deaf ears. As they had already buffaloed the powers that be.
...Eyes dazzled by new gear...
I think we've all seen this happen a lot. It isn't about need, it's about want.
-or-
"You guys must hate public safety and want us all to die if you won't buy us a fully tricked out APX8000's", even though no one else in the county used anything other than VHF analog.
If anyone wants to make the case that a contract does the first responders a 'grave disservice' they would have to prove a substantial deficiency of some sort.
Paying too much would be doing the taxpayers a disservice, but this implies that - for the same money - the state could have had a superior solution for the users.
Basically Motorola is saying the decision is bad for first responders and at same time telling Desantis to scale back coverage sites and new radios. Hypocritical as usual.