- Joined
- Dec 18, 2002
- Messages
- 168
- Reaction score
- 7
Interesting, thanks for the update Wayne. Those same NACs also used on the mobile inputs? I updated the BASE channels in the database - do you know of any changes needed for the repeater NACs?
From what I have observed, yes they are the same.VictorXray said:Interesting, thanks for the update Wayne. Those same NACs also used on the mobile inputs?
See my post a couple days ago regarding Texas City DPS...VictorXray said:I updated the BASE channels in the database - do you know of any changes needed for the repeater NACs?
sdurham said:Question: when programing VHF p-25 does the scanner pick up the p-25 on its own.
I have a uniden-bc-296D
skywatch said:I'll try to listen closer to W'falls. any word on the delay for childress/amarillo?
scanaholic said:I wish I'd have waited a little longer, and got the Pro-96 before popping for this Pro-433. All I could think was "Get something to trunk the Abilene "fahr house".With all this digital stuff, I could've gotten back the DPS and some counties like Shackelford and Nolan, who are pretty much full time digital, with the Pro-96. Now, we're hearing that Taylor Co. S.O. is crying for a new digital system due to their old ones being out of warranty and parts can't be gotten for them.
Two questions: If I eventually fork over for a Pro-96, will they copy both digital and analog at the same time, or just one at a time, according to how it is set? Are they hard to set up?
Had it not been for a guy named Dick on this forum, I would have NEVER figured out how to set up this 433 to trunk. The Shack manuals are 1st class jokes, and the store clerks are moreso.
Thanks-