BCD436HP/BCD536HP: UHF Reception Issues due to Noise from Battery Compartment

Status
Not open for further replies.

bearcat

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
741
You're saying that shielding on the "inside" of the battery door (the part where one side faces the batteries and the other side faces the "outside air" around the scanner) helps reception?

I'm willing to give it a shot, especially considering I haven't been seeing the issues you have. It'll make for a good "control" or comparison.

The one time I do have demonstrable interference/attenuation is when the radio is plugged in to a USB power source while it's receiving. Similar to what you say with regards to the "hissing" - if I plug in the USB charging cable, a noticeable hiss/degradation in reception occurs, but only on a fairly narrow chunk of VHF in the 155 MHz range. All other bands appear unaffected.

Just out of curiosity, have you tried putting shielding on the "other side" of the batteries, i.e. in between the batteries and the SD card?
Yes the inside part of the battery case lid that faces the batteries. My testing is mostly on analog UHF as my county probably has a hundred or so freqs. The P25 UHF I have in my area is also improved, but the P25 is a very small sample size. As there is just not much of it around here.
 

bearcat

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
741
Curious to hear others results....UHF on mine is definitely terrible. I'm considering this:

https://www.amazon.com/Tapes-Master-10ft-Copper-Foil/dp/B00Z8MCK6M

Certainly cheaper than giving Uniden even more of my money....
I would love to hear your results. I certainly will buy another type of tape if it works even better. If you do not see any improvement with the tape you buy. I could send you a piece of mine. I have a fairly large roll and you only need about 3 or 4 inches to do the job. I have been able to test this on 4 radios. One was from the original shipment of radios and one that was about one year newer and the third was just received. The fourth radio I cannot determine when that one was purchased. The results were the same of every radio. A major improvement on UHF. I would say it is about 90% of the reception of the 396XT now.
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
I would love to hear your results. I certainly will buy another type of tape if it works even better. If you do not see any improvement with the tape you buy. I could send you a piece of mine. I have a fairly large roll and you only need about 3 or 4 inches to do the job. I have been able to test this on 4 radios. One was from the original shipment of radios and one that was about one year newer and the third was just received. The fourth radio I cannot determine when that one was purchased. The results were the same of every radio. A major improvement on UHF. I would say it is about 90% of the reception of the 396XT now.

Tape is ordered -- I guess I'll know more by Thursday...
 

KE5MC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,242
Location
Lewisville, TX
Product used:

3M™ EMI Copper Foil Shielding Tape 1181

I removed the foam block, applied tape in two pieces (.5" width) and burnished with q-tip then trimmed with razor knife. Easy enough to do and came out about as well as I could expect.

Not really done any test/comparison yet. UHF has not been a problem, but thought I would give it a try and see if any improvement.

I will report back in a few days.

Mike
 
Last edited:

Jay911

Silent Key (April 15th, 2023)
Feed Provider
Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
9,378
Location
Bragg Creek, Alberta
Has anyone tried putting tape on the other side of the batteries, between them and the SD card slot? I'm wondering if that makes a difference.
 
D

darunimal

Guest
mcscanner Nice clean job, exactly what I was thinking. Good question Jay911 hope to see that answered soon.
 

KevinC

The big K
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2001
Messages
12,731
Location
I'm everywhere Focker!
I did a quick measurement with my spectrum analyzer. Around the middle battery the noise floor will rise about 20 dB in the UHF range (it might in other areas also, but I didn't test elsewhere).

You can actually watch the radio power up/down as the noise floor will rise before the "on" beep and stay elevated after the "off" beep.

I didn't test any shielding, so I can't comment on that.
 
D

darunimal

Guest
Time to try it, just on the top side, of the side card. In Fact a Dime covers the SD card slot, but then I just tried a Penny crushed a little with a 3lb sledge against concrete and it works perfectly> I don't have a sniffer so you'll have to check it out Kevin C, and the batteries & door do go own without a hassle
 

Attachments

  • Bcd436HPSdUHFblockerPenny.jpg
    Bcd436HPSdUHFblockerPenny.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 1,663
  • Bcd436HPSdUHFblockerDime.jpg
    Bcd436HPSdUHFblockerDime.jpg
    35.5 KB · Views: 1,648

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
Wondering if this would work:MG Super Shield Conductive Nickel Coating - 12 Oz. - MG-841-340g. It's kinda pricey, but it can do >29 dB of shielding in the UHF band. Just not sure if it would be appropriate. It would also be permanent.

We use the liquid (non aerosol) version of this extensively at work. I will take my radio in to work tomorrow and give it a treatment and post my results.

I do monitor a decent amount of UHF including a P25 UHF system and have noticed some "noise". Worth a shot, a replacement cover cost a few bucks....

One disclaimer about this, we generally apply this under a fume hood so for a at-home application a respirator is a must.

Anne-britt
 

bearcat

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
741
Has anyone tried putting tape on the other side of the batteries, between them and the SD card slot? I'm wondering if that makes a difference.
I thought I did answer this, but I did do that during my tests and actually found things to be worse. Somebody else can surely give it ago and see what they find.
 

jeffm77

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
380
Location
pittsburgh, pa
I just tried putting a copper shield between the SD card and the batteries. Still the same interference noise. I will have to try the copper tape on the inside of the battery door.
 

bearcat

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
741
I did a quick measurement with my spectrum analyzer. Around the middle battery the noise floor will rise about 20 dB in the UHF range (it might in other areas also, but I didn't test elsewhere).

You can actually watch the radio power up/down as the noise floor will rise before the "on" beep and stay elevated after the "off" beep.

I didn't test any shielding, so I can't comment on that.
Could you measure VHF and 800 also? I think we all agree the radio is great on 800, but it would be nice to see how much noise is in the VHF band.
 

bearcat

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
741
Time to try it, just on the top side, of the side card. In Fact a Dime covers the SD card slot, but then I just tried a Penny crushed a little with a 3lb sledge against concrete and it works perfectly> I don't have a sniffer so you'll have to check it out Kevin C, and the batteries & door do go own without a hassle
I started my experiment by just shielding the SD card without any luck. I would still like to see what you find.
 

Jay911

Silent Key (April 15th, 2023)
Feed Provider
Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
9,378
Location
Bragg Creek, Alberta
I thought I did answer this, but I did do that during my tests and actually found things to be worse. Somebody else can surely give it ago and see what they find.

Sorry - if you said it I missed it. I was thinking, with the observations I made about when external power is applied to the radio, that charging the batteries might be what's causing (at least some of) the interference.

I'm still trying to wrap my head around how shielding the batteries from the outside world helps things. Maybe the whole battery compartment is "unshielded" and either the internal energy of the radio is leaking out, or "bad" energy is leaking in?
 

bearcat

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
741
Product used:

3M™ EMI Copper Foil Shielding Tape 1181

I removed the foam block, applied tape in two pieces (.5" width) and burnished with q-tip then trimmed with razor knife. Easy enough to do and came out about as well as I could expect.

Not really done any test/comparison yet. UHF has not been a problem, but thought I would give it a try and see if any improvement.

I will report back in a few days.

Mike
Let us know what you find. When I did mine going under the foam I still had a fair amount of noise. Going over the foam was the real deal. In fact I have a spare cover without foam and did not get the same positive results with that cover. You have the right tape so it should work better than my tape. Just find a UHF analog signal that is not full quieting and listen to the noise increase when you remove the cover during a transmission.
 

bearcat

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
741
Sorry - if you said it I missed it. I was thinking, with the observations I made about when external power is applied to the radio, that charging the batteries might be what's causing (at least some of) the interference.

I'm still trying to wrap my head around how shielding the batteries from the outside world helps things. Maybe the whole battery compartment is "unshielded" and either the internal energy of the radio is leaking out, or "bad" energy is leaking in?
I do not charge my batteries in the radio so I do not know about that. I am not an engineer and have no technical explanation but I know it works for me. I agree to me it is very strange. I think someone on here with some electronic background is going to find the real answer/source. The SA test with a 20db increase in noise floor at the middle battery is a start.
 

jeffm77

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
380
Location
pittsburgh, pa
You would think that if enough people complained to Uniden about the problem, they would fix it. I mean, this radio is not cheap and it deserves to be fixed and should be fixed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top