VIPER Statewide Radio System Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nortonterrier

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Messages
39
ULS License - Trunked Public Safety 700 MHz License - WQYA799 - NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY PATROL
Trunked Public Safety 700 MHz License - WQYA799 - NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY PATROL

560 SIGMON RD
LINCOLNTON, NC LINCOLN County *


000769.53125000 *
000770.03125000 *
000771.10625000 *
000771.38125000 *
000772.35625000 *
000772.60625000 *
000773.21875000 *
000774.18125000 *
000774.45625000 *
000774.89375000 *
 

ncdadof3

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
153
Location
Morganton NC
Tg#31020

Picking up TG# 31020 it falls in Mitchell Co range and it definitely is a Tac channel. Fire fighting Ops was what was picking up.
 

basstuba

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
332
Robeson viper

picked up 39550 unknown law talk group .on st.pauls viper site. Anyone out there have an idea who this could be?
 

BCasto

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
351
Location
Morrisville NC
Encryption in the future for Viper?

With all the recent discussion about encryption, I am wondering if Viper will make that move in the future? Realistically, living in Wake County there are only 2 primary systems to monitor: Viper and Wake Simulcast. From some of you involved in those systems, can you say if there are plans to encrypt and if so will it be all radio traffic?

One reason I ask is I am considering updating my equipment to the latest models, i.e. 536HP. If encryption is in the near future it makes no sense to do that. Of course if I had a clue what Uniden Products are on the horizon, that might influence the decision too.

Since I mentioned Uniden, I wonder what their position and forecast is for encryption. I suppose Whistler is looking at this too. Encryption has to be a consideration at Uniden as they allocate their R&D monies. If encryption can potentially dramatically shrink the scanner market just how much more energy will they invest. I suppose the same question could be asked about the scanner software providers. Or for that matter, what will it do to used scanner prices?

What say you?
 

zapman987

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
297
Location
nc, recently moved to jax, FL
Maybe Im way off, but knowing what I do on encryption in general, it will take far to much compute power to put on a scanner to decrypt. Its probably a losing battle for scanners.

I dont see fire encrypting at all. Too many interop problems as is, encryption is just one more issue that fire depts dont need on the scene of a major fire. A lot of little depts dont want to pay for it. At a county level maybe, but then again, when you get a big system going (Viper) not everyone again wants to pay for it or use it.
 

GamecockSJ

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
171
Location
Greenville, NC
VIPER is a collective of agencies. Each agency can decide to encrypt their own talkgroup(s), but I don't think the folks that run the network will decide for them and encrypt everything in one fell swoop. It seems like they discourage encryption if anything.
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
With all the recent discussion about encryption, I am wondering if Viper will make that move in the future? Realistically, living in Wake County there are only 2 primary systems to monitor: Viper and Wake Simulcast. From some of you involved in those systems, can you say if there are plans to encrypt and if so will it be all radio traffic?

One reason I ask is I am considering updating my equipment to the latest models, i.e. 536HP. If encryption is in the near future it makes no sense to do that. Of course if I had a clue what Uniden Products are on the horizon, that might influence the decision too.

Since I mentioned Uniden, I wonder what their position and forecast is for encryption. I suppose Whistler is looking at this too. Encryption has to be a consideration at Uniden as they allocate their R&D monies. If encryption can potentially dramatically shrink the scanner market just how much more energy will they invest. I suppose the same question could be asked about the scanner software providers. Or for that matter, what will it do to used scanner prices?

What say you?

I'm sure there will be lots to listen to with scanners for some time to come... just maybe not everything you'd like to hear.

Maybe Im way off, but knowing what I do on encryption in general, it will take far to much compute power to put on a scanner to decrypt. Its probably a losing battle for scanners.
Scanners are NEVER going to be able to decrypt - think of decryption as "they no longer use a radio"... it is gone - unless they opt to revert back to non-encryption (it has happened for some users in some areas).
I dont see fire encrypting at all. Too many interop problems as is, encryption is just one more issue that fire depts dont need on the scene of a major fire. A lot of little depts dont want to pay for it. At a county level maybe, but then again, when you get a big system going (Viper) not everyone again wants to pay for it or use it.
Fire/EMS has encrypted in some places ... not necessarily in NC or on VIPER - yet - as far as I know.
 

zapman987

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
297
Location
nc, recently moved to jax, FL
Scanners are NEVER going to be able to decrypt - think of decryption as "they no longer use a radio"... it is gone - unless they opt to revert back to non-encryption (it has happened for some users in some areas).

Fire/EMS has encrypted in some places ... not necessarily in NC or on VIPER - yet - as far as I know.

And from what Ive heard, they were cities with little mutual aid need, not JimBob and Joe's volunteer fire dept with no money, who calls every cousin and brother in the county (and a few counties over) if there is a fire.
 

BCasto

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
351
Location
Morrisville NC
DMR encryption?

Just was wondering if DMR systems are easily encrypted?

Yes, I have read where a small number of agencies have turned off encryption. It was basically done because the policy makers were on a transparency mission.
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
Just was wondering if DMR systems are easily encrypted?

Encryption is encryption - doesn't matter if it is DMR or P25. Same process.

Different types of encryption may be "easier" on a processor but those encryption types could be applied to any number of underlying protocols.

Yes, I have read where a small number of agencies have turned off encryption. It was basically done because the policy makers were on a transparency mission.
Probably true. However, in some cases, I believe it was done due to unforeseen or expected Interop issues - sometimes after bad consequences.
 

GMB951

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
730
During the Forrest fires yesterday and the Fire Talk Groups I monitored for Cumberland Co it appears they are listed wrong I will try to figure this out'
These are the ones I corrected so far
TG# 13522 is Tac # 1A
TG# 13523 is Tac # 8A
All info has been sumitted
 
Last edited:

GMB951

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
730
Appears to have been a shooting in Harnett Co<Cumb,Harnett and SHP units in a big search
Talk Group being used at present #52145 Trp B Harnett
#51955 S/W Events 1
#22036 Harnett Events 1
#52225 Trp B Mutual Aid
 
Last edited:

GMB951

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
730
Checking different systems for interop and to me the Viper system we have has little or no interop with either South Carolina or VA or it is not been put out yet. The TACN System Tenn. advanced comm system has it right they have the western side of GA covered so they have day to day and unit to unit coverage in both states
 

BCasto

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
351
Location
Morrisville NC
Viper Peer Sites

With a better antenna I am now clearly getting the site at Durham Cole Mill Road. I am a little surprised to be getting Orange Co. TGs on that Durham site. When I look at the details for the Cole Mill Road site I see the following sites listed as "peers sites":

015 - Durham Cole Mill Road --

007 - Durham Duke University
009 - Durham, Camden Avenue
012 - Orange Chapel Hill
013 - Chatham Chatham Mountain
019 - Orange Eno Mountain
026 - Orange Laws
072 - Person Mt. Tirzah

I don't quite understand the role of a peer site. Does it mean if I am listening to Durham Cole Mill Road site (015), I can hear the radio traffic from its peers. Is that the reason I am hearing Orange County TGs on the Durham Cole Mill Road site? How dynamic is the peer assignment? Does it ever change? Please help me understand better the peer site configuration.
 

GMB951

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
730
Yep have them in my scanners used to hear radio checks on them but when SC started the build out
of their system have not monitored any thing. But will let every body know if I monitor anything also have a friend on the SCHP that I can check with
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
Yep have them in my scanners used to hear radio checks on them but when SC started the build out
of their system have not monitored any thing. But will let every body know if I monitor anything also have a friend on the SCHP that I can check with

I think in the recent past I'd hear a radio check/roll call around 3am daily... then again, that may have been before Palmetto went P25.
 

KE4ZNR

Radio Geek
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
7,447
Location
Raleigh, NC
Brian,
Remember that While Orange County is a Primary user of VIPER, Durham County is a secondary user. The Cole Mill Rd site is considered an "overflow" site for the heavy VIPER usage in Orange County. Sure Cole Mill Rd also carries SHP radio traffic along with medical transport services but one of it's most important tasks is to act as that Orange County overflow site.

Marshall KE4ZNR


With a better antenna I am now clearly getting the site at Durham Cole Mill Road. I am a little surprised to be getting Orange Co. TGs on that Durham site. When I look at the details for the Cole Mill Road site I see the following sites listed as "peers sites":

015 - Durham Cole Mill Road --

007 - Durham Duke University
009 - Durham, Camden Avenue
012 - Orange Chapel Hill
013 - Chatham Chatham Mountain
019 - Orange Eno Mountain
026 - Orange Laws
072 - Person Mt. Tirzah

I don't quite understand the role of a peer site. Does it mean if I am listening to Durham Cole Mill Road site (015), I can hear the radio traffic from its peers. Is that the reason I am hearing Orange County TGs on the Durham Cole Mill Road site? How dynamic is the peer assignment? Does it ever change? Please help me understand better the peer site configuration.
 

BCasto

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
351
Location
Morrisville NC
Marshall, thank you for your always spot-on response. Would you consider Wake County a secondary user of VIPER also?

Since I have multiple scanners, I can monitor at least 2 Wake Co. VIPER sites. Sometimes the traffic on both is the same and some time not.

While we are at it, why does RDU use both its own trunked system for some functions and Wake Simulcast for others? Their own trunked system is not very active.

Another one, I get 3-4 bars of signal strength for Durham City, but I don't hear much radio traffic. Do they use MDTs or some other communications tool that keeps radio traffic very light?

Thank you ..
 

KE4ZNR

Radio Geek
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
7,447
Location
Raleigh, NC
Threaded

Marshall, thank you for your always spot-on response. Would you consider Wake County a secondary user of VIPER also?

I am sure Wake would indeed consider themselves a secondary VIPER user. Like Durham, They have their own radio system for Primary day to day comms and only use VIPER for Interop and Mutual Aid situations.

Since I have multiple scanners, I can monitor at least 2 Wake Co. VIPER sites. Sometimes the traffic on both is the same and some time not.

That would indeed be the system resource management of the Smartzone side of VIPER. No need to carry talkgroup audio of there are no radios affiliated to the site that would use said talkgroup.

While we are at it, why does RDU use both its own trunked system for some functions and Wake Simulcast for others? Their own trunked system is not very active.

A variety of reasons why KRDU uses the mixture of the Wake System and their own system....a few right off the top of my head:
--The KRDU/Wake configuration makes sense from a public safety perspective. In the terribly unfortunate situation of a downed aircraft most mutual aid would first come from Wake County. Hence provide said mutual aid response with a robust system that can accommodate the flood of radio traffic that would need to take place.
--Remember that the KRDU radio system has only 6 frequencies and a limited coverage pattern. Again in a mass casualty situation you need to a have a radio system that has more capacity and a large reception footprint as some of the mutual aid agencies could be coming from various parts of Wake & Durham Counties.
--Using the Wake System for Public Safety frees up the 6 channel KRDU system to be used by other airport groups such as buses, security, maintenance, etc. It also gives the airport more capacity within their coverage pattern for future use.
--Just because we realize that KRDU uses both the Wake Radio System and the Airport system does not mean the end user does. With the radios in use today switching between radio systems can be transparent to the end user with them being non the wiser.

Another one, I get 3-4 bars of signal strength for Durham City, but I don't hear much radio traffic. Do they use MDTs or some other communications tool that keeps radio traffic very light?

While Durham PD does have MDT access in their vehicles I can tell you that their is no lack of radio traffic on the Durham system. I know because I monitor and talk on the radio system 8+ hours a day at work and also monitor system activity from home 24/7 being that I am on call for the city. You are probably experiencing the dreaded simulcast distortion and need to have a directional beam pointed in the direction of the closest of the 4 towers that make up the Durham System. Simulcast reception from outside the intended coverage pattern is always a roll of the dice as the system was probably not designed to be received from where you are located. The Durham system has great reach into the NW Raleigh area and into Brier Creek but any further east is a crapshoot at best.

Thank you ..

No worries.
Happy Monitoring!
Marshall KE4ZNR
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top