can i give someone my win 96 key if i no longer use it
IOW, one license is good for the world IYO. What a crock. :roll:jon23 said:Of course you can sell it. Who cares what it says in the "license agreement"? The license agreement would never hold up in court.
If you purchased the product it is now yours and you can sell it if you wish.
It is up to the developer to design the product so it cant be transferable...
Best regards,
Jon
jon23 said:Of course you can sell it. Who cares what it says in the "license agreement"? The license agreement would never hold up in court.
If you purchased the product it is now yours and you can sell it if you wish.
It is up to the developer to design the product so it cant be transferable...
Best regards,
Jon
IOW= in other words. IYO= in your opinion.jon23 said:fmon I don't understand the acronyms...
Can you still use the car at will if sold? Not likely. Can you still use the software at will? Certainly, anytime you wish.AlabamaRS said:The Key was NOT stolen or whatever it was PAID for, therefore he owns it & can do with it whatever he wishes. can who you bought your car from, tell you tht you can't sell it???
To add to Frank's excellent post. the old computerr will have to be running Version 1.55 or newer to reveal the license information.. . . If you have the old computer in use, open Win96, click help and select License which will reveal your complete current key.
"We all know that we could sell our keys over and over on eBay or better yet post them on every warez site from here to China"
Thats not what I am saying.
If I am not using the product anymore and decide to sell it, then there is nothing emoral about it... PERIOD. The developer already made their money on that individual product sale.
Apply this concept to anything else that you buy like your car or house etc... imagine if you could not recover any of your cost when you were done with them?? Whats the difference when it comes to software?
Also know that the developer of this product did not release it to get a warm and fuzzy feeling on all the forums, it was released for one reason and thats to make money. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but don't think that because people are selling his software that he won't have future updates, this is after all how the developer can make the most money. One could say that in some cases a security breach or hack is the number one motivator for a new release. On future releases the developer generally changes the security scheme to lessen any concerns of piracy...
If the developer was truly worried about people passing around keys he would have purchased one of a thousand different security wrappers that eliminate the possibility of passing keys. The wrapper currently used (armadillo) offers none of this protection.
Of course this is just my opinion and like a-holes every one has one
Best regards,
Jon
Someone is currently doing just that. I guess he's not concerned that his personal information (name, email address, postal address) is in the information he's "selling"."We all know that we could sell our keys over and over on eBay"
Actually, Armadillo does offer that, and Win96 used it prior to 01 March 2004. From the initial release until March 2004, keys were "hardware locked" - registration keys depended on a "hardware value" that was compiled from several machine-specific sources. A key generated for one PC wouldn't likely work on another. Unfortunately, that became a major headache - for me and for users. Moving to a new machine, or even replacing a network card, could invalidate a registration key. So, I switched from the "hardware locked" keys to keys based on "personal information".If the developer was truly worried about people passing around keys he would have purchased one of a thousand different security wrappers that eliminate the possibility of passing keys. The wrapper currently used (armadillo) offers none of this protection.