LIScanner101
Completely Banned for the Greater Good
OK, I know this may not be as “sexy” a topic as the millions of X36HP threads but I’ll give it a shot:
I STILL own just a BCT15X. For Suffolk County NY, there is a trunked police department system (Mot II). Within that system, there are so many different TGIDs that I have taken to creating TWO systems with the same name, and putting half of one set of all the TGIDs in one and half in the other.
I know I could have combined ALL the TGIDs into less than or equal to 20 groups (the maximum number of groups the scanner will support in one TRS) but if I did that the alpha tagging would have gotten very difficult to follow. The way I have it set up it is very clear as to exactly who you are listening to at any given moment because I have many groups labelled very carefully to match what channels are "under" them.
My question is: Is this “slowing down” my scanner? Does my scanner have to check the control channel TWICE (once for each system) before decoding and locking on a TG? If so, how much faster would it be if I combined all the TGs into a single (but not very “tage friendly”
system?
I STILL own just a BCT15X. For Suffolk County NY, there is a trunked police department system (Mot II). Within that system, there are so many different TGIDs that I have taken to creating TWO systems with the same name, and putting half of one set of all the TGIDs in one and half in the other.
I know I could have combined ALL the TGIDs into less than or equal to 20 groups (the maximum number of groups the scanner will support in one TRS) but if I did that the alpha tagging would have gotten very difficult to follow. The way I have it set up it is very clear as to exactly who you are listening to at any given moment because I have many groups labelled very carefully to match what channels are "under" them.
My question is: Is this “slowing down” my scanner? Does my scanner have to check the control channel TWICE (once for each system) before decoding and locking on a TG? If so, how much faster would it be if I combined all the TGs into a single (but not very “tage friendly”