• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Baofeng Baofeng UV32/DM32

jewest

Newbie
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Baofeng released a new version of the CPS -- 1.41. It gives a false positive on MS Defender when installing the application. Looks like they fixed at least a couple of my reported issues. Firmware version is unchanged.
Not false-positive.. Defender SmartScreen warns you because the exe's are unsigned. A result of lazy developers.

Just a custom build of OpenGD77 at the end of the day. If they can't develop their own firmware then I doubt they could pull off anything malicious.
 

rescuecomm

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
1,595
Reaction score
347
Location
Travelers Rest, SC
I suppose you reported the reversed enc/ decode issue? On another item, does turning off the GPS make the battery last longer? I can't see any real difference on my limited testing.
 

devicelab

Radio N.E.R.D
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
1,919
Reaction score
703
Location
WA (USA)
I suppose you reported the reversed enc/ decode issue? On another item, does turning off the GPS make the battery last longer? I can't see any real difference on my limited testing.
They fixed a couple of spelling errors. I didn't play with GPS so I can't provide any feedback there.

I did report the tone issue, but I'll need to verify the 141 build fixed that issue. Since my codeplug is rather set for the moment, I'm not eager to do a bunch of testing. If someone else can verify 141 fixed that issue then please do so.
 

BruceMichaels

Not "Some People"
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 30, 2015
Messages
115
Reaction score
23
Location
Flying Over You
I know I asked this about 6 months ago, but has anyone been able to change the display from "Bank 1" to whatever you have named the bank? This is for the UV-32.

Thanks!
 

Falcon9h

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
452
Reaction score
411
Anyone else notice that with both of these radios that squelch sensitivity is poor on some frequencies, even when set to 1?
 

lamarrsy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 12, 2003
Messages
235
Reaction score
198
Location
Rimouski, PQ, Canada
Anyone else notice that with both of these radios that squelch sensitivity is poor on some frequencies, even when set to 1?
Yes indeed, the squelch is too thight even at 1 (on my DM-32).
That’s why I went into the special settings in the CPS and readjusted the squelch to a lower level, more acceptable and more on par with other radios.
 

devicelab

Radio N.E.R.D
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
1,919
Reaction score
703
Location
WA (USA)
Anyone else notice that with both of these radios that squelch sensitivity is poor on some frequencies, even when set to 1?
Remember to also be on the correct bandwidth setting for that frequency. I've noticed these Chicom radios have a hard time with SQL and different bandwidths.
 

rescuecomm

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
1,595
Reaction score
347
Location
Travelers Rest, SC
I just had a transmit problem trying to do a net check in on 443.450R/448.450T repeater. The display bar that shows TX power wouldn't indicate above 447.250. The net control said I was barely readable. I ended up reloading the program and it's okay now.

Interesting to say the least.
 

Falcon9h

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
452
Reaction score
411
Yes indeed, the squelch is too thight even at 1 (on my DM-32).
That’s why I went into the special settings in the CPS and readjusted the squelch to a lower level, more acceptable and more on par with other radios.
Can you put the procedure up here?That'd be really helpful and maybe I'd use the thing for a change.

Wish the same could be done on the UV32 but no test mode in the CPS.
 

lamarrsy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 12, 2003
Messages
235
Reaction score
198
Location
Rimouski, PQ, Canada
Can you put the procedure up here?That'd be really helpful and maybe I'd use the thing for a change.

Wish the same could be done on the UV32 but no test mode in the CPS.
Hello, really sorry for the late reply.
I had to be in front of my PC with the CPS open, to answer correctly.
Note that I have CPS v.1.41 and firmware 1.46.

The squelch can be adjusted (fine-tuned?) under « Tool(T) / Adjust mode » and the password of this section is 66660501.

When in this section after entering the password, *please* begin by « reading » your current version of settings in your radio by clicking on « Read(R) » and then SAVE this to your computer by clicking on « Save(S) ». Chose a naming that will tell you it’s the original settings that you are saving.

This is essential to do, because each radio has its *own* settings. In case of screwing something up, you’ll be happy to have this original settings saved in your PC, as you can’t even « borrow » the original settings of another radio.

The squelch settings I have changed are on the right side section (« RXFunc Items ») : the columns 1 2 3 4 5 of this grid correspond to the 1 2 3 4 5 columns of the bottom left section (« Freq Item »), which tells you which sections of the 136 (to 174MHz) VHF or the 400 (to 470MHz) UHF frequencies you’d like to adjust.
In my case I wanted to lower the squelch on the VHF section, namely the ~145MHz (column 2), ~155MHz (column 3), and the ~165MHz (column 4) of my wide (W) FM frequencies. I don’t listen to narrow (N) FM frequencies.

So… if you have followed correctly at this point (I just ‘hope my explanation are ok), you will now understand that I went into the right section, I clicked the box of « Edit RX/Other » to be able to Edit the values of the grid, and I lowered the values of columns 2, 3, and 4, on the line « SQ1 Open(136)(W) ».

My original values were 70, 70, and 80 (for columns 2, 3, and 4); My actual values are now 55, 55, and 65, which gives me much better receive in weak signals, for these frequencies ranges, without opening up too much on spurious noise.

Of course I have then saved (« Save(S) ») these new settings with a different name than the original Save, and I uploaded them to the radio with the « Write(W) » command.

I really hope these instructions are clear enough !

And I cannot insist enough on the recommendation of *saving your original settings* before doing anything in this section.

I have not explored any of the other settings, as I am not in need of any changes in other parameters.
Still, this is a very risky manipulation, and I cannot be responsible for any goof you may create !

Just be sure to SAVE - SAVE - SAVE the original settings before anything else !

‘Hope this helps !

-Sylvain, VE2LAM
 

BruceMichaels

Not "Some People"
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 30, 2015
Messages
115
Reaction score
23
Location
Flying Over You
I know I asked this about 6 months ago, but has anyone been able to change the display from "Bank 1" to whatever you have named the bank? This is for the UV-32.

Thanks!
Just in case anyone else thought about this, I got a reply back from Baofeng support:

Thank you for your detailed explanation and screenshot.

After confirming with the supplier, we regret to inform you that the zone names displayed on the radio screen cannot currently be customized to show your renamed labels (such as “InterOp” or “EMS”). At this time, they will still appear as Zone 04, Zone 05, etc.

We have noted your feedback and will consider adding this feature in a future firmware update. We truly appreciate your patience and understanding.
 

Attachments

  • UV32.jpg
    UV32.jpg
    58.7 KB · Views: 29

CarlPB

Newbie
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 23, 2025
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Just an FYI, there is a prime day deal today (10/07/2025) on these. I'm still on the fence even with the sale due to all the mixed feedback. This would be a potential first DMR capable radio for me.
 

chief21

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
2,022
Reaction score
739
Location
Western NC (Summer); Tampa Bay FL (Winter)
Just an FYI, there is a prime day deal today (10/07/2025) on these. I'm still on the fence even with the sale due to all the mixed feedback. This would be a potential first DMR capable radio for me.
The DM32 still has a few warts, but the DMR performance seems pretty good - especially at the current price point. Get one!
 

robertwbob

KE0WRU
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
621
Reaction score
607
Location
Northeast jasper county,missouri
Just an FYI, there is a prime day deal today (10/07/2025) on these. I'm still on the fence even with the sale due to all the mixed feedback. This would be a potential first DMR capable radio for me.
hey jump in head first. might be your best or worse but not like buying a name brand expensive radio n discover you dont like it
 

VK2CRB

Member
Joined
May 18, 2024
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Location
Sydney
I am in Australia and have recently purchased the Baofeng DM-32 radio but the bandwidth limitations posed a problem as our CB band is in the 477Mhz range.

I recently found this Russian site that has a firmware .bin file that was able to allow an expansion of the usable bandwidth 23-136Mhz and 220-520Mhz.

The new Firmware is dm32.01.02.46 which expands the frequencies.

I have updated my two radios and it seems to work vey well with even allowing the 27Mhz AM band programming (but not tested) although the 477Mhz has been tested and works well although you loose the startup picture but I changed this to show Voltage instead.

The existing CPS does not allow you to change the bandwidth in the program outside the listed 136-174Mhz 400-470Mhz but if you export to csv file and then update the frequencies and import the csv file back to the radio it all works fine and then the CPS will reflect the changes when you Read to and from radio.

Link to the site for the .bin file is Просмотр сообщений - Koshak

As far as I can see this is a great radio for the price with a lot more to offer I suspect.
Are you saying that putting the Russian firmware, after successful flashing the CPS 1.41 still will not allow to program channels beyond 470 MHZ ? That is not clear to me. I wonder if the hardware is prepared for that dynamic range in the RX and TX stages. Baofeng has no professional behaviour to answer, sadly. Thanks
 

robertwbob

KE0WRU
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
621
Reaction score
607
Location
Northeast jasper county,missouri
Just an FYI, there is a prime day deal today (10/07/2025) on these. I'm still on the fence even with the sale due to all the mixed feedback. This would be a potential first DMR capable radio for me.
i bit the bullet but got uv 32 as dmr is dead here. main reason bigger screen for aging eyes. read reception flaw but im in wide open farm country n nearest neighbor over mile away. will try several antennas i got too never know whats best till you try em and use meter
 

devicelab

Radio N.E.R.D
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
1,919
Reaction score
703
Location
WA (USA)
There's a new DM-32 firmware update and CPS version on the Baofeng Support site. I completed the upgrade to version 48 and it seems to be working fine. Read the Firmware Upgrade document BEFORE doing your upgrade.

(There was a 3rd step to reset the radio which isn't working for me. I sent email to Baofeng support so we'll see what they say.)

The new CPS is working OK too.
 
Top