Kill the Proscan connection, restart the scanner and then try the updater.
Tried that. It says to install the virtual serial driver. Is that something that needs to be done in addition to the driver necessary for ProScan?Kill the Proscan connection, restart the scanner and then try the updater.
Got the fw updated.TY SIR!
What's the trick with this firmware update tool? If I manually select the com port, it tells me access denied. If I auto detect, it can't see the scanner. I have a connection with Pro Scan.
Also....can't enter trunk freqs with 5 numbers right of the decimal point?
458AD / 227 Monroe County NYExactly what system are you trying to scan? Away from home right now but will take a look when I get back home.
Till then maybe some else can look at your file.

Here is a PDF file which will answer all of your questions about using quick keys. Print it out and save it for your reference.There's 1 system, 3 groups...I have GQK's setup, but I can't seem to add group 3 to the list of groups being scanned, and I can't remove group 0.
Do I get around the simulast system limitation by having a single site with all the system control channels? Is it even possible to do that? Did you notice how the software truncates the last digit from the 700 meg channels?Took a look at your programming and it looks good. You do need to add Quick Keys to the MC East, MC South, and MC West towers so you can turn them on and off, till you figure out which tower you get the best reception on. (see pic below)
It is a simulcast site so as the other folks have indicated, the 325P2 wasn't designed for simulcast so reception is hit and miss and often distorted.
View attachment 197289
Yessir. Ty very much.Here is a PDF file which will answer all of your questions about using quick keys. Print it out and save it for your reference.
There really is no way to get around Simulcast Distortion. You will need to purchase an SDS 100, 150, or 200.Do I get around the simulast system limitation by having a single site with all the system control channels? Is it even possible to do that? Did you notice how the software truncates the last digit from the 700 meg channels?
So it's possible then that this is not the right device for trying to monitor such a system then?
Each "site" in the system is made up of multiple towers that all transmit on the same frequencies at the same time. There is no way to listen to only one tower. As far as the frequencies go, a scanner's receiver isn't precise enough that it will matter if the last digit is truncated (or rounded).Do I get around the simulast system limitation by having a single site with all the system control channels? Is it even possible to do that? Did you notice how the software truncates the last digit from the 700 meg channels?
I know a number of folks have already told you this, but I live in Monroe County, and I have had ZERO success monitoring the system with a BCD325P2 (or BCD996P2). I wish that wasn't the case since they are a lot cheaper than an SDS and great scanners ... except for simulcast.So it's possible then that this is not the right device for trying to monitor such a system then?