Not buying it... I'll take the word of a trustworthy thoughtful person over others- even officials, .Many gov's do a great job of disseminating information through tools like Nixle, PulsePoint, EverBridge, etc etc., and have PIOs and people assigned to put stuff out not just to inform, but to seek information. Some do not.
Third/fourth/fifth party information is as useless as middle school rumors. Ever play the game of telephone? None of that has a place in official response cues.
If hams or volunteer group wants to be an asset and not a liability, get trained, know what to do when in harm's way, and know what to say and what not. Words cannot be taken back anymore than bullets from a gun.
Especially if the other persons reputation is on the line and I have a chance to inquire about the situation.
I would accept, at least initially, a lot of information from people that post on Radio Reference that have built up reputations (for not being deceptive and but trying to be helpful) than a lot of "official" sources of information.
Too much misleading going on for me to just follow a single source only.
Thanks
Joel
Last edited: